Author Topic: Ending the Small ball Nonsense  (Read 4207 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« on: December 18, 2021, 12:49:44 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8677
  • Tommy Points: 1138
 When the roster was determined last year many people here were coming up with the best starting fives.

 The best and most talented starting five was blatantly obvious but any poster to put down this lineup was ridiculed immediately. 

 This lineup may be the only salvation and hope for the celtics this year.  I do need to know exactly how many minutes this five has played together,  but they have absolutely dominated the opposition when all healthy and playing together.

 Plus 20 per 100 possessions I believe the announced said during the Warriors game. You can guess it before I tell you.  I'm so tired of this small ball crap.

If two of your best five players are bigs, you start them together! It's not rocket science!

 Drum roll please.......

Timelord
Horford
Tatum
Brown
Smart

 A lineup with virtually no holes. Last year when this was brought up. Horford can't play PF! Timelord can't shoot! You can't switch every position!
 Blah, Blah, Blah, absolute nonsense. 

 It's your best five it should be our starting five every night they are all healthy.  End Small ball.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2021, 01:10:32 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Actually, going by net rating for lineups used over 25 minutes this season, our best lineup by a longshot is a small ball lineup of:

Schroder, Smart, JRich, Tatum and Timelord. 39 minutes played +45.5 net rating.

The starting lineup of:

Smart, Brown, Tatum, Horford Timelord. 87 minutes played. +20.6 net rating

At over 20 minutes played two great lineups have been:

Smart, Brown, Tatum, Grant, Timelord. 22 minutes played. +35.3 net rating

Smart, Langford, JRich, Tatum, Horford. 21 minutes. +32.8 net rating

The rest of the lineups have too little minutes played to be considered, IMO.

So, there is proof that both small and 2 big lineups can be highly successful, depending upon who is in each lineup


Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2021, 01:19:37 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8884
  • Tommy Points: 290
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2021, 02:12:02 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8677
  • Tommy Points: 1138
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2021, 02:57:05 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8884
  • Tommy Points: 290
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2021, 03:10:16 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8677
  • Tommy Points: 1138
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2021, 04:38:04 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8884
  • Tommy Points: 290
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?
For Center yes. If you play any at center they are a small ball center.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2021, 07:42:03 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8677
  • Tommy Points: 1138
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?
For Center yes. If you play any at center they are a small ball center.



 Disagree. Would you rather have 7 foot Kelly Olynyk with a 6'11" wingspan and a 28" vertical at center. Or Bob Williams at 6'9" with a 7'5" wingspan and a 40" plus vertical.

 

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2021, 11:09:33 PM »

Offline Sophomore

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6227
  • Tommy Points: 823
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?
For Center yes. If you play any at center they are a small ball center.

Is DeAndre Ayton undersized at center? Because his standing reach is the same as Rob’s.

Until players start rebounding or blocking shots with their heads, their height tells you less than their standing reach. Other factors that matter are weight, leverage, footwork, and skill. Al and Rob just are not undersized.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2021, 11:22:37 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.

Horford still is.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2021, 07:14:58 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8884
  • Tommy Points: 290
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?
For Center yes. If you play any at center they are a small ball center.



 Disagree. Would you rather have 7 foot Kelly Olynyk with a 6'11" wingspan and a 28" vertical at center. Or Bob Williams at 6'9" with a 7'5" wingspan and a 40" plus vertical.
Do I need a 3 to tie?

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #11 on: December 19, 2021, 07:19:03 AM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8884
  • Tommy Points: 290
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?
For Center yes. If you play any at center they are a small ball center.

Is DeAndre Ayton undersized at center? Because his standing reach is the same as Rob’s.

Until players start rebounding or blocking shots with their heads, their height tells you less than their standing reach. Other factors that matter are weight, leverage, footwork, and skill. Al and Rob just are not undersized.
Until they go against a 6'11 or bigger guy with strength and weight they can't handle. It's why the team has Kanter.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2021, 08:49:41 AM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15241
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
No player over 6'9 looks like small ball compared to a good amount of teams.



 That's not the point. It's a two big lineup that most people believe can't work in today's game. Timelord has a 7'5" wingspan and Horford has a 7'2" wingspan.

 Horford was also among the best Defenders of 7 foot Embiid a couple of years ago.
Want to split it and say undersized double bigs can work?


.It doesn't matter what you call it. Timelord and Horford aren't undersized.  Is Draymond green? Anthony Davis is only 6'9" is je undersized?
For Center yes. If you play any at center they are a small ball center.



 Disagree. Would you rather have 7 foot Kelly Olynyk with a 6'11" wingspan and a 28" vertical at center. Or Bob Williams at 6'9" with a 7'5" wingspan and a 40" plus vertical.
TP to KGLL for pointing out the main reason why Rob Williams can play against taller centers.

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #13 on: December 19, 2021, 09:49:55 AM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10313
  • Tommy Points: 465
Got to have BIGS to win
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Ending the Small ball Nonsense
« Reply #14 on: December 19, 2021, 12:15:46 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15241
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Got to have BIGS to win
Fascinating. Please continue….