Author Topic: Indiana moving toward rebuild, open to trade talks on LeVert, Sabonis, Turner  (Read 13302 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline todd_days_41

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1463
  • Tommy Points: 1074
  • B2B 2022 and 2023 Trade Deadline Guru
This proposal's main players are featured players on teams with worse records than the Celtics. It actually makes the Celtics worse.

We can only make trades with good teams? Guess that rule out Kevin Garnett. And Ray Allen. And Paul Pierce.

But somehow trading Schroeder for John Wall makes sense?

Offline Sophomore

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6227
  • Tommy Points: 823
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2021, 01:25:33 PM by Sophomore »

Offline mobilija

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3085
  • Tommy Points: 738
This proposal's main players are featured players on teams with worse records than the Celtics. It actually makes the Celtics worse.

We can only make trades with good teams? Guess that rule out Kevin Garnett. And Ray Allen. And Paul Pierce.

But somehow trading Schroeder for John Wall makes sense?

I think its more that we were also trading our best players in the scenario he was commenting on.

So...our best players swapped for best players on a worse team then makes us the worse team.

Offline todd_days_41

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1463
  • Tommy Points: 1074
  • B2B 2022 and 2023 Trade Deadline Guru
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.

LeBron? He was picked 1st in the draft, as I recall.

I “invest” equally above in the Nuggets, Bucks, and Spurs — three teams considered to have top scouting departments. Did they just “get lucky”? Historical track record says otherwise. No one nails ‘em all, but you gotta get more right than Ainge did.

Was Smart a great pick? Last I checked, the guy picked behind him is an All-Star. He was also picked 6th, and Brown and Tatum (both excellent picks obviously) we’re picked 3rd — not 15th. Or 39th. Or 41st.

Too often the player picked directly after the Cs has been far better than our pick. It’s really not debatable.

Offline showtime

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 279
  • Tommy Points: 20
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
Julius Randle all day over Smart!

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
This proposal's main players are featured players on teams with worse records than the Celtics. It actually makes the Celtics worse.

We can only make trades with good teams? Guess that rule out Kevin Garnett. And Ray Allen. And Paul Pierce.

But somehow trading Schroeder for John Wall makes sense?

I think its more that we were also trading our best players in the scenario he was commenting on.

So...our best players swapped for best players on a worse team then makes us the worse team.
TP mob. That's exactly what it was about. And todd knew that, that's why he cut out Ohio's post out of the reply to Ohio that I made, so that he could take my reply out of context and reply in an antagonistic manner. That's also why he referenced a small portion of a trade I made in another thread rather than the whole trade. It's trolling 101.

Offline todd_days_41

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1463
  • Tommy Points: 1074
  • B2B 2022 and 2023 Trade Deadline Guru
This proposal's main players are featured players on teams with worse records than the Celtics. It actually makes the Celtics worse.

We can only make trades with good teams? Guess that rule out Kevin Garnett. And Ray Allen. And Paul Pierce.

But somehow trading Schroeder for John Wall makes sense?

I think its more that we were also trading our best players in the scenario he was commenting on.

So...our best players swapped for best players on a worse team then makes us the worse team.
TP mob. That's exactly what it was about. And todd knew that, that's why he cut out Ohio's post out of the reply to Ohio that I made, so that he could take my reply out of context and reply in an antagonistic manner. That's also why he referenced a small portion of a trade I made in another thread rather than the whole trade. It's trolling 101.

I cut out the trade itself because I wasn’t commenting on it. I was remarking on your (absurd) rationale for shooting it down, combined with the fact you suggested trading for John Wall today in another thread.

Is any more context really required than your quote? Come on — Can’t have your cake and eat it too.

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34518
  • Tommy Points: 1597
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
Smart was not consecutive with Brown and Tatum.  And Smart was ok, but there were clearly better value players in the lottery after Smart (Randle at 7, LaVine at 13) not even thinking about someone like Warren or Nurkic who've both had a better season than any in Smart's career (though Smart's career has been better).  All top 16 picks.  And of course the reigning league MVP was 41st in that draft, though obviously shouldn't have been an option to consider at 6.  James Young at 17 though was a much worse pick than Smart in that actually draft.  Young was just a bad pick.

The next draft was Rozier at 16, which was a solid pick, though he then followed that up with RJ Hunter at 27 which was a terrible pick at the time and in retrospect.

Brown worked out well (though Murray and Sabonis are similar level of player), but he really messed up Yabu at 16 and Zizic at 23.  Imagine if Beasley or LeVert were taken at 16 and Siakam or D. Murray at 23.  And they traded the 31st pick for a future 1st, but that could have been someone like Brogdon.  How much different does Boston look today if that had been the draft.

Tatum was obviously fantastic especially with the trade, but that is the last move Ainge made that you could say that about.  It went pretty much downhill from that point on.  And yes I'm even including signing Hayward because I absolutely would have acquired Paul George and not worried about the cap space needed to sign Hayward, because George is and was better than Hayward (I still would have tried to sign Hayward, I just would have pulled the trigger on the rumored trade with the Pacers for George - and this isn't retrospect, I was all over this board posting about it at the time).
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16176
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
Smart was not consecutive with Brown and Tatum.  And Smart was ok, but there were clearly better value players in the lottery after Smart (Randle at 7, LaVine at 13) not even thinking about someone like Warren or Nurkic who've both had a better season than any in Smart's career (though Smart's career has been better).  All top 16 picks.  And of course the reigning league MVP was 41st in that draft, though obviously shouldn't have been an option to consider at 6.  James Young at 17 though was a much worse pick than Smart in that actually draft.  Young was just a bad pick.

The next draft was Rozier at 16, which was a solid pick, though he then followed that up with RJ Hunter at 27 which was a terrible pick at the time and in retrospect.

Brown worked out well (though Murray and Sabonis are similar level of player), but he really messed up Yabu at 16 and Zizic at 23.  Imagine if Beasley or LeVert were taken at 16 and Siakam or D. Murray at 23.  And they traded the 31st pick for a future 1st, but that could have been someone like Brogdon.  How much different does Boston look today if that had been the draft.

Tatum was obviously fantastic especially with the trade, but that is the last move Ainge made that you could say that about.  It went pretty much downhill from that point on.  And yes I'm even including signing Hayward because I absolutely would have acquired Paul George and not worried about the cap space needed to sign Hayward, because George is and was better than Hayward (I still would have tried to sign Hayward, I just would have pulled the trigger on the rumored trade with the Pacers for George - and this isn't retrospect, I was all over this board posting about it at the time).

I agree that some of the absolute whiffs with later picks like Yabu, Hunter, Zizic did hurt us and there were a reasonable amount of rotation players he should have gotten with at least one of those picks. I am a bit surprised you would rather have Warren than Smart at this point especially given Warren has basically been out the last year and a half. He is obviously a better offensive player, but we probably need perimeter defense more than we do additional scoring with our teams the last 3-4 years (brown, tatum, rozier, kemba, hayward, morris all wanting too many shots already.

What exactly was the proposed George trade? Also do we have confidence he would have stayed here and not done the same thing he did to OKC? Seems similar to Leonard in that he really wanted to eventually end up in LA.

Offline todd_days_41

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1463
  • Tommy Points: 1074
  • B2B 2022 and 2023 Trade Deadline Guru
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
Smart was not consecutive with Brown and Tatum.  And Smart was ok, but there were clearly better value players in the lottery after Smart (Randle at 7, LaVine at 13) not even thinking about someone like Warren or Nurkic who've both had a better season than any in Smart's career (though Smart's career has been better).  All top 16 picks.  And of course the reigning league MVP was 41st in that draft, though obviously shouldn't have been an option to consider at 6.  James Young at 17 though was a much worse pick than Smart in that actually draft.  Young was just a bad pick.

The next draft was Rozier at 16, which was a solid pick, though he then followed that up with RJ Hunter at 27 which was a terrible pick at the time and in retrospect.

Brown worked out well (though Murray and Sabonis are similar level of player), but he really messed up Yabu at 16 and Zizic at 23.  Imagine if Beasley or LeVert were taken at 16 and Siakam or D. Murray at 23.  And they traded the 31st pick for a future 1st, but that could have been someone like Brogdon.  How much different does Boston look today if that had been the draft.

Tatum was obviously fantastic especially with the trade, but that is the last move Ainge made that you could say that about.  It went pretty much downhill from that point on.  And yes I'm even including signing Hayward because I absolutely would have acquired Paul George and not worried about the cap space needed to sign Hayward, because George is and was better than Hayward (I still would have tried to sign Hayward, I just would have pulled the trigger on the rumored trade with the Pacers for George - and this isn't retrospect, I was all over this board posting about it at the time).

I agree that some of the absolute whiffs with later picks like Yabu, Hunter, Zizic did hurt us and there were a reasonable amount of rotation players he should have gotten with at least one of those picks. I am a bit surprised you would rather have Warren than Smart at this point especially given Warren has basically been out the last year and a half. He is obviously a better offensive player, but we probably need perimeter defense more than we do additional scoring with our teams the last 3-4 years (brown, tatum, rozier, kemba, hayward, morris all wanting too many shots already.

What exactly was the proposed George trade? Also do we have confidence he would have stayed here and not done the same thing he did to OKC? Seems similar to Leonard in that he really wanted to eventually end up in LA.

Gotta refute the notion of Yanu and Zizic as late picks. They were in the teens. Too often, Ainge couldn’t source NBA players in the first 3rd of the NBA draft.

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16176
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
Smart was not consecutive with Brown and Tatum.  And Smart was ok, but there were clearly better value players in the lottery after Smart (Randle at 7, LaVine at 13) not even thinking about someone like Warren or Nurkic who've both had a better season than any in Smart's career (though Smart's career has been better).  All top 16 picks.  And of course the reigning league MVP was 41st in that draft, though obviously shouldn't have been an option to consider at 6.  James Young at 17 though was a much worse pick than Smart in that actually draft.  Young was just a bad pick.

The next draft was Rozier at 16, which was a solid pick, though he then followed that up with RJ Hunter at 27 which was a terrible pick at the time and in retrospect.

Brown worked out well (though Murray and Sabonis are similar level of player), but he really messed up Yabu at 16 and Zizic at 23.  Imagine if Beasley or LeVert were taken at 16 and Siakam or D. Murray at 23.  And they traded the 31st pick for a future 1st, but that could have been someone like Brogdon.  How much different does Boston look today if that had been the draft.

Tatum was obviously fantastic especially with the trade, but that is the last move Ainge made that you could say that about.  It went pretty much downhill from that point on.  And yes I'm even including signing Hayward because I absolutely would have acquired Paul George and not worried about the cap space needed to sign Hayward, because George is and was better than Hayward (I still would have tried to sign Hayward, I just would have pulled the trigger on the rumored trade with the Pacers for George - and this isn't retrospect, I was all over this board posting about it at the time).

I agree that some of the absolute whiffs with later picks like Yabu, Hunter, Zizic did hurt us and there were a reasonable amount of rotation players he should have gotten with at least one of those picks. I am a bit surprised you would rather have Warren than Smart at this point especially given Warren has basically been out the last year and a half. He is obviously a better offensive player, but we probably need perimeter defense more than we do additional scoring with our teams the last 3-4 years (brown, tatum, rozier, kemba, hayward, morris all wanting too many shots already.

What exactly was the proposed George trade? Also do we have confidence he would have stayed here and not done the same thing he did to OKC? Seems similar to Leonard in that he really wanted to eventually end up in LA.

Gotta refute the notion of Yanu and Zizic as late picks. They were in the teens. Too often, Ainge couldn’t source NBA players in the first 3rd of the NBA draft.
Wasn't Zizic 23rd?

Offline todd_days_41

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1463
  • Tommy Points: 1074
  • B2B 2022 and 2023 Trade Deadline Guru
Nesmith or Romeo, three #1s, two pick swaps for Sabonis?

.... the moment you realize missing on picks makes a big difference. Could have taken 4-5 guys over Nosmith who would've improved our chances at a trade like this.

Even when you win the NBA lottery, you're still playing a game of chance.

....a homer Csblog argument for over a very long time because we've struggled outside the Top 3 in the draft.,

Yeah right. Total homer argument. It is well known that the Celtics are terrible at picking, and really, everyone else is hitting jackpot after jackpot consistently because drafting beyond pick 10 is super easy and a totally 100% sure deal.

Ah, the standard defense. It's like a warm blanket on this blog.

You're literally bringing nothing to the discussion except "uh u stupid".

At least I went out my way to find data and gave you credit.

Maybe try being a bit less of a negative force.

Oh come on. If the Cs had made a better pick than Nesmith, they'd be in a better position to trade for Sabonis -- simple as that. Blaming the draft like its a roulette game is homerism.

Being objective is not a "negative force."

Note how I use the quotes properly. I dunno what Uh U Stupid is about but it didn't come from me.

Maybe don't start your argumenting by saying someone's being a homer.

Also, statistics backed me up.

Also, saying "yeah but if we drafted someone better than Nesmith we'd get better return" is a bit ... I don't know how to say this. It's kinda like saying "if I had $10 I'd have more than if I had $5." Like, yeah, okay. My whole point was that finding the $10 is purely chance.

Stats backed me up on it so call me a homer all you want, I'm right.

The warm blanket thing was also the most useless thing to say in a discussion ever. What did that add to the discussion huh? Did you expect everyone to go "oh yeah, good point, we now suddenly agree with you"?

No, you were just trying to rile someone up a lil.

That's what I mean by being a negative force.

Man, someone has their blood up. You just rip me broadly for objecting to the Cs recent draft record as the luck of the draw. Seriously?

And what stats are you referring to? I don’t see any. Do stats back up drafting Nesmith over Anthony, Maxey, Bey, Quickley, Bane or others? Nope.

How about any of the articles posted by Sophomore?

Happy to read ‘em — haven’t.

In short; they show that outside the top 10, the odds of scoring on a pick are whimsical at best.

(and that Boston/Danny have been pretty solid at picking in the draft)

Oh hey… then we must be doing great then (treading water at .500).

The reigning league MVP was picked 41st in the NBA draft. The guy before him was picked 15th…. One pick after Kelly Olynyk, who Ainge traded up for. That guy who was picked 15th won a championship last year, and his “2nd Star” was picked 39th in the draft. The 2019 NBA champs were lead by a guy who was picked 15th, as well. And on and on and on.

Read all the articles you want. Danny Ainge NEVER landed a pick in that way. Ever. In 18 years. And frankly, he got worse as he went. The only championship he won was led by three guys he didn’t draft, and his most recent legacy picks sitting on our bench ain’t exactly the Globetrotters.

Ainge was a truly great transactional GM. But he missed a ton in the draft.

You’re investing an awful lot in the Bucks here, and giving Ainge zero credit for three straight excellent drafts - Smart, Brown, Tatum. Those were absolutely not consensus picks, and tell me, who was picked after those guys he should’ve picked instead? you’re blaming him because he couldn’t draft KD or LeBron because they weren’t up the year he had a high pick? Who in your view is that year’s Giannis that Ainge missed on? Some of this really is down to luck.

If you want to say he didn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat late in the draft, the way a few GMs have done, I agree with you. I do disagree that that makes him bad at drafting. He did about average on those picks, arguably above average.
Smart was not consecutive with Brown and Tatum.  And Smart was ok, but there were clearly better value players in the lottery after Smart (Randle at 7, LaVine at 13) not even thinking about someone like Warren or Nurkic who've both had a better season than any in Smart's career (though Smart's career has been better).  All top 16 picks.  And of course the reigning league MVP was 41st in that draft, though obviously shouldn't have been an option to consider at 6.  James Young at 17 though was a much worse pick than Smart in that actually draft.  Young was just a bad pick.

The next draft was Rozier at 16, which was a solid pick, though he then followed that up with RJ Hunter at 27 which was a terrible pick at the time and in retrospect.

Brown worked out well (though Murray and Sabonis are similar level of player), but he really messed up Yabu at 16 and Zizic at 23.  Imagine if Beasley or LeVert were taken at 16 and Siakam or D. Murray at 23.  And they traded the 31st pick for a future 1st, but that could have been someone like Brogdon.  How much different does Boston look today if that had been the draft.

Tatum was obviously fantastic especially with the trade, but that is the last move Ainge made that you could say that about.  It went pretty much downhill from that point on.  And yes I'm even including signing Hayward because I absolutely would have acquired Paul George and not worried about the cap space needed to sign Hayward, because George is and was better than Hayward (I still would have tried to sign Hayward, I just would have pulled the trigger on the rumored trade with the Pacers for George - and this isn't retrospect, I was all over this board posting about it at the time).

I agree that some of the absolute whiffs with later picks like Yabu, Hunter, Zizic did hurt us and there were a reasonable amount of rotation players he should have gotten with at least one of those picks. I am a bit surprised you would rather have Warren than Smart at this point especially given Warren has basically been out the last year and a half. He is obviously a better offensive player, but we probably need perimeter defense more than we do additional scoring with our teams the last 3-4 years (brown, tatum, rozier, kemba, hayward, morris all wanting too many shots already.

What exactly was the proposed George trade? Also do we have confidence he would have stayed here and not done the same thing he did to OKC? Seems similar to Leonard in that he really wanted to eventually end up in LA.

Gotta refute the notion of Yanu and Zizic as late picks. They were in the teens. Too often, Ainge couldn’t source NBA players in the first 3rd of the NBA draft.
Wasn't Zizic 23rd?

Probably. May be mixing him up with the Yabu pick (same year?). Regardless, that guy sucks. We were lucky he was considered an asset of some sort by CLE.

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34518
  • Tommy Points: 1597
I agree that some of the absolute whiffs with later picks like Yabu, Hunter, Zizic did hurt us and there were a reasonable amount of rotation players he should have gotten with at least one of those picks. I am a bit surprised you would rather have Warren than Smart at this point especially given Warren has basically been out the last year and a half. He is obviously a better offensive player, but we probably need perimeter defense more than we do additional scoring with our teams the last 3-4 years (brown, tatum, rozier, kemba, hayward, morris all wanting too many shots already.

What exactly was the proposed George trade? Also do we have confidence he would have stayed here and not done the same thing he did to OKC? Seems similar to Leonard in that he really wanted to eventually end up in LA.
I wouldn't necessarily rather have Warren, was just pointing out that he has been a similar level of player to Smart so acting like Smart was a homerun can't miss draft pick isn't really accurate, especially with Randle and LaVine both in the lottery after him.

I think the George trade that was rumored to be on the table was Crowder, Smart, and a 1st (the one that became R. Williams) - some reports had an additional 1st or two being involved, but reportedly not the BKN one we used in the Irving trade or the LA/SAC pick (maybe Memphis and another Boston, as an example).  The trade was being discussed in June 2017 so it was before free agency opened.  As I recall, Indiana wanted the trade to be done, but Ainge didn't want to pull the trigger until after free agency started because he thought he could create more cap room by signing a player first and then making the trade.  When Ainge delayed, they moved on and traded him to OKC for Oladipo and the pick that was used for Sabonis.

I said it then and I still maintain, Ainge should have just pulled the trigger and acquired George and then figured out how to sign Hayward after the fact.  As it was, Boston had to drop some salary so had to trade Bradley for Morris.  I'm sure Boston could have just moved some salary without taking back Morris and still made the room to acquire Hayward.  And then still could have potentially acquired Irving with Bradley instead of Crowder.  I absolutely believe that even as good as Lebron was, the C's with a starting 5 of Irving, Hayward, George, Tatum, and Horford with Rozier, Brown, Baynes, Theis, etc. on the bench would have gotten by the Cavs that first season.  Wouldn't have beaten the Warriors that year, but certainly would have been set up very nicely if George re-upped in the summer 2018.  Even if Irving didn't stick around the following year, with George, Hayward, Tatum, Brown, Horford, and probably Rozier, the long term outlook would have been a lot better.

Not acquiring George was really the beginning of the end of the Ainge era.  It was indicative of his indecision that he had the last couple of years.  He just couldn't pull the trigger time and time again, and the one time he did he picked the absolute worst player to pull the trigger on (both in personality and on the court).
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Offline greg683x

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Tommy Points: 593
I haven’t seen Kendrick Perkins, Leon Powe, or Glen Davis mentioned.

None of them made an all star team but all of those guys were solid contributors on championship teams, which is what you would want from picks outside of the lottery.

Yes he whiffed on more recent picks in the back half of the first round but Danny had so many picks hoarded that he had to take gambles on players that in some cases wouldn’t take up a roster spot or salary the next season.  His crime was not pulling a trigger on trades for these picks.

Everyone wants to mention Giannis, Jokic, and these other players, but let’s examine other picks those GMs made, I’m sure they have whiffs just like Ainge *coughJabariParkercough*.  The Bucks could have Joel Embiid and Giannis on the same team
Greg

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I haven’t seen Kendrick Perkins, Leon Powe, or Glen Davis mentioned.

None of them made an all star team but all of those guys were solid contributors on championship teams, which is what you would want from picks outside of the lottery.

Yes he whiffed on more recent picks in the back half of the first round but Danny had so many picks hoarded that he had to take gambles on players that in some cases wouldn’t take up a roster spot or salary the next season.  His crime was not pulling a trigger on trades for these picks.

Not for lack of trying... it takes 2 to tango.