I guess people see more in Hield than I do. I see him more like Fournier, a 3 & D guy without the D. Inflated stats on bad teams. I do like his diminishing contract but you are still going to be paying him around $20M a year to likely come off the bench.
He would be a nice player off the bench, for sure, I just don't know how good. I fear you would see the Fournier effect meaning that once he gets on a more competitive team, the hollowness in his stats gets revealed.
He is a better shooter than Richardson, particularly from 3, which is valuable, but isn't Richardson better at everything else? And even with that said, SAC likely would want something different than Richardson or why not just keep Hield?