Author Topic: 2021-2022 Point Guard?  (Read 12980 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #30 on: June 26, 2021, 11:45:32 AM »

Offline Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10325
  • Tommy Points: 465
Just read on Yahoo that Spencer Dinwiddle wants to go to either Lakers or Clippers..but his demands may be to high..if he does go to Clips, we can trade Thompson for Beverly straight up?
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #31 on: June 26, 2021, 07:20:37 PM »

Offline ausbacker

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 388
  • Tommy Points: 39
Just read on Yahoo that Spencer Dinwiddle wants to go to either Lakers or Clippers..but his demands may be to high..if he does go to Clips, we can trade Thompson for Beverly straight up?

Why would we want a worse version of Smart?

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #32 on: June 26, 2021, 07:52:44 PM »

Offline celts10

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 543
  • Tommy Points: 25
I wouldn't mind George Hill or Ricky Rubio.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #33 on: June 26, 2021, 09:30:36 PM »

Offline feckless

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1218
  • Tommy Points: 93
If Marcus Smart is our starting PG next season then we are in big trouble

Yes we are!
Days up and down they come, like rain on a conga drum, forget most, remember some, don't turn none away.   Townes Van Zandt

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #34 on: June 26, 2021, 10:23:08 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
Patty Mills is available. He's an FA this season. I heard he have a good relation with our new coach so Brad should at least give him an offer.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #35 on: June 26, 2021, 10:54:18 PM »

Offline showtime

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 279
  • Tommy Points: 20
What we get with Smart is pretty good playmaking for others, an average offensive talent, when he doesn't try to do too much, and an all league defender who can switch and guard anyone in the league well, except maybe Joel Emblid. Having 3 defenders (also the J's) who can guard just about anyone, makes the Celtics  defense formidable. I think PP is a strong back-up. I don't think we need more than a league minimum 3rd PG. The only way this does not work is if Smart takes many more shots than he should, I am willing to give it a try, and spend our resources on Fournier, extending Williams, and maybe picking up a 4.

On the other hand, he isn't particularly complementary to Tatum and Brown, which is the core objective of management. He slows down the pace and movement, and he has questionable judgement. He's no longer an awful 3 point shooter, but he's still not good enough for teams to stop cheating off to help out. He can't beat anyone off the dribble, except old-man style.

He's acceptable for now, but we'd get a lot better if he played a different role.

If we don't make a move, I think it might be worth it to try Tremont Waters for 10-15 games and see how it goes. He's a good passer, he can shoot, he's a remarkably good defender for such a small player, and he brings pace that Marcus doesn't. He's got a toughness about him. It could very well not work, but we really need some pace to get the most out of our stars and it might be worth a try.
My thoughts exactly!! Waters may be the best pure point guard on the team, at this point!

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #36 on: June 26, 2021, 11:33:14 PM »

Offline seancally

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1097
  • Tommy Points: 119
If not Smart, then ideally a strong third wheel with Tatum and Brown. Count me in on the (likely BS) McCollum rumblings. Would love him in green.

Smart, fine. He’ll do. Can’t decide if he’s more likely to be a responsible, measured, playmaking PG; or to look around and think, “huh, guess I’m the 3rd option” — and try to take on more offensive load. The latter would be a nightmare.

Smart is an excellent defender but this team can be a great defensive team without him. Other teams manage to defend well without having Marcus Smart. You need good athletes, good size, and good effort.

Smart as starting PG - ok - but keep an eye on that. We gonna pay him to do that going forward? We’ll see.

Love me some PP and hope he gets more run as the backup.
"The game honors toughness." - President Stevens

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #37 on: June 27, 2021, 02:07:03 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7842
  • Tommy Points: 770
Patty Mills is available. He's an FA this season. I heard he have a good relation with our new coach so Brad should at least give him an offer.

If there isn't a bigger deal to be made elsewhere, this is exactly the kind of signing I'd love to see. A vet with championship experience who still has some left in the tank. And if I remember right, Mills is tough for a little guy.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #38 on: June 27, 2021, 03:19:28 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Patty Mills is available. He's an FA this season. I heard he have a good relation with our new coach so Brad should at least give him an offer.

If there isn't a bigger deal to be made elsewhere, this is exactly the kind of signing I'd love to see. A vet with championship experience who still has some left in the tank. And if I remember right, Mills is tough for a little guy.

He's not the type of PG they need. He is really a small shooting guard. Not a play maker.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #39 on: June 27, 2021, 03:20:36 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
What we get with Smart is pretty good playmaking for others, an average offensive talent, when he doesn't try to do too much, and an all league defender who can switch and guard anyone in the league well, except maybe Joel Emblid. Having 3 defenders (also the J's) who can guard just about anyone, makes the Celtics  defense formidable. I think PP is a strong back-up. I don't think we need more than a league minimum 3rd PG. The only way this does not work is if Smart takes many more shots than he should, I am willing to give it a try, and spend our resources on Fournier, extending Williams, and maybe picking up a 4.

On the other hand, he isn't particularly complementary to Tatum and Brown, which is the core objective of management. He slows down the pace and movement, and he has questionable judgement. He's no longer an awful 3 point shooter, but he's still not good enough for teams to stop cheating off to help out. He can't beat anyone off the dribble, except old-man style.

He's acceptable for now, but we'd get a lot better if he played a different role.

If we don't make a move, I think it might be worth it to try Tremont Waters for 10-15 games and see how it goes. He's a good passer, he can shoot, he's a remarkably good defender for such a small player, and he brings pace that Marcus doesn't. He's got a toughness about him. It could very well not work, but we really need some pace to get the most out of our stars and it might be worth a try.
My thoughts exactly!! Waters may be the best pure point guard on the team, at this point!

Waters would be perfect if he were a few inches bigger, and more disciplined as a shooter.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #40 on: June 27, 2021, 05:25:04 PM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8134
  • Tommy Points: 535
What we get with Smart is pretty good playmaking for others, an average offensive talent, when he doesn't try to do too much, and an all league defender who can switch and guard anyone in the league well, except maybe Joel Emblid. Having 3 defenders (also the J's) who can guard just about anyone, makes the Celtics  defense formidable. I think PP is a strong back-up. I don't think we need more than a league minimum 3rd PG. The only way this does not work is if Smart takes many more shots than he should, I am willing to give it a try, and spend our resources on Fournier, extending Williams, and maybe picking up a 4.

On the other hand, he isn't particularly complementary to Tatum and Brown, which is the core objective of management. He slows down the pace and movement, and he has questionable judgement. He's no longer an awful 3 point shooter, but he's still not good enough for teams to stop cheating off to help out. He can't beat anyone off the dribble, except old-man style.

He's acceptable for now, but we'd get a lot better if he played a different role.

If we don't make a move, I think it might be worth it to try Tremont Waters for 10-15 games and see how it goes. He's a good passer, he can shoot, he's a remarkably good defender for such a small player, and he brings pace that Marcus doesn't. He's got a toughness about him. It could very well not work, but we really need some pace to get the most out of our stars and it might be worth a try.
My thoughts exactly!! Waters may be the best pure point guard on the team, at this point!

Waters would be perfect if he were a few inches bigger, and more disciplined as a shooter.
Tremont Waters would be perfect if he was actually good at basketball. He’s literally the worst player on the Cs and quite literally doesn’t deserve a roster spot. I miss Shane Larkin. Guy was a perfect 3rd pg off the bench.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #41 on: June 28, 2021, 01:25:18 PM »

Offline spikelovetheCelts

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1616
  • Tommy Points: 113
  • Peace it's a board. We all will never agree.
SO No one thinks Carsen Edwards can rise up, hmm. We still have some trade exemption to use. 
I think Smart gets the shot he has earned it. If he sucks Trade him at the deadlne. If  Dennis smith is there for a low Salary I think he would be good for a third PG.
"People look at players, watch them dribble between their legs and they say, 'There's a superstar.'  Well John Havlicek is a superstar, and most of the others are figments of writers' imagination."
--Jerry West, on John Havlicek

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #42 on: June 29, 2021, 10:30:31 AM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7842
  • Tommy Points: 770
Patty Mills is available. He's an FA this season. I heard he have a good relation with our new coach so Brad should at least give him an offer.

If there isn't a bigger deal to be made elsewhere, this is exactly the kind of signing I'd love to see. A vet with championship experience who still has some left in the tank. And if I remember right, Mills is tough for a little guy.

He's not the type of PG they need. He is really a small shooting guard. Not a play maker.
My first choice would be the Celtics magic a deal to get Lonzo so that they do get that pass-first pg. But, barring that, I don't need the back-up pg (which is what Mills would likely be) to be in that mold. Just a steady hand who can make plays and operate whatever system Udoka puts in place.

Mills seems perfect for that role.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008, 2024

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #43 on: June 29, 2021, 08:54:05 PM »

Offline bogg

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 817
  • Tommy Points: 51
Considering that the last four starting point guards have either been shipped out as damaged goods or walked on bad terms in free agency, I really hate it for Marcus that the narrative going into next year is already starting to get framed that he's the problem at point guard holding the team back. In reality the franchise can't keep a lead guard and the do-it-all sixth man is going to bail them out by playing out of position for a season+ since the none of the remaining full-time point guards are better at the job than he is. He'll even get to spend the season getting complained about on sports radio by warehouse workers and FedEx drivers for his trouble.

Re: 2021-2022 Point Guard?
« Reply #44 on: June 29, 2021, 09:05:32 PM »

Offline showtime

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 279
  • Tommy Points: 20
Considering that the last four starting point guards have either been shipped out as damaged goods or walked on bad terms in free agency, I really hate it for Marcus that the narrative going into next year is already starting to get framed that he's the problem at point guard holding the team back. In reality the franchise can't keep a lead guard and the do-it-all sixth man is going to bail them out by playing out of position for a season+ since the none of the remaining full-time point guards are better at the job than he is. He'll even get to spend the season getting complained about on sports radio by warehouse workers and FedEx drivers for his trouble.
playing out of position? Do you really think he is a shooting guard?