This roster isn't ready to compete, so what's the point? Playing musical chairs with coaches isn't going to transform our team into a contender.
I'm not sure honestly.
This roster is better then people give it credit for.
* We have three all-star calibre players (Tatum, Brown and Kemba) - at least one of those guys is on the borderline of true superstar status.
* We have three role players who are exceptionally good at their role in Fournier (scoring), Thompson (rebounding) and Smart (defence)
* We have two solid prospects who have shown a great deal of promise (Rob Williams and Payton Pritchard)
It's actually a pretty good roster on paper. The roster is either good enough to contend, or else it's pretty [dang] close to it. And many of the players on that roster are far from reaching their prime, meaning the roster (in its current form) can only get better.
Now granted, we didn't have Fournier or Parker most the year, and our top 3 guys (Brown, Tatum and Kemba) have all missed significant games to injury or Covid. It does need to be acknowledged that this plays a significant part.
Rob Williams also didn't really start to emerge until later in the year, and he also missed quite a few games. Normally I'd say all of this offers a good explanation for a team struggling...but in this case I don't. The reason I don't is because of WHO they struggled against. This team lost to a LOT of really bad teams, in many cases it was by way of blowouts. I don't believe those opponents had more talent on the floor then the Celtics with their depleted rosters, so I find it difficult to blame talent or health.
If they beat the bad treams and lost to good teams, different story. When you get blown out by 20+ by a bottom 5 team that's NOT a talent problem. That seemed ot happen far to often for Boston this year .