Of course Brad knows much his players far better than the finest posters here (guys like Gouki who rarely contest his decisions). But the problem is that Nesmith played a little when the team played quiet well early seasons. We saw big limitations (he also didn't play since almost one year), but we also saw some potential skills (still raw but there) even in his defense.
Now our team really played poorly bad collectiv and/or defensive games (Pistons, Knicks, Suns ...) for many reasons. Brad had to rebuild his rotations; using Gleaguers level players with no future in the league ala Green, Teague or Edwards, titularising limited guys like Pritchard or Ojeleye. And there just a little garbage time for Nesmith. I really don't get it.
Nesmith was drafted quiet high and may be our last lottery pick before a while. Even for 10 minutes a match, even if he isn't good, even he is fouled out regulary, we need to give him time. We don't look to compete for the max of winnings or I don't see it. What interest do we have to give again and again chances to players who almost always disapoint, like Teague and Green, and not going after a guy for who we invested for our future ? It's a big and long question ...