Author Topic: Would Danny announce what kind of player he would like to get back in a trade?  (Read 1448 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fred Ziffel

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 38
  • Tommy Points: 4
I saw that Danny wanted a big that can shoot and play defense in a trade. I haven't seen Danny lose many trades.  So wouldn't that message drive up the price of that type of player when dealing with the Celtics?  I'm no economics major but I am thinking that Danny will go in a different direction.  My guess is Bradley Beal.

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63129
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I think every GM knows we want a stretch 4.  We pursued Bertrans last deadline, then Milsap in free agency.  We possibly inquired on John Collins, and drafted Grant Williams to play that role (fairly poorly).

So, I think he was just stating the obvious.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3030
  • Tommy Points: 355
I think every GM knows we want a stretch 4.  We pursued Bertrans last deadline, then Milsap in free agency.  We possibly inquired on John Collins, and drafted Grant Williams to play that role (fairly poorly).

So, I think he was just stating the obvious.

I know you're anti-Keith, but he actually just wrote an interesting article about the Celtics' negotiation tactics over the years.

Long story short: They're straight to the point and know exactly what they want and what they're willing to give up. So I think that lines up with what you just wrote. There's no harm in letting teams know what you're looking for.

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13770
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
I think every GM knows we want a stretch 4.  We pursued Bertrans last deadline, then Milsap in free agency.  We possibly inquired on John Collins, and drafted Grant Williams to play that role (fairly poorly).

So, I think he was just stating the obvious.

I know you're anti-Keith, but he actually just wrote an interesting article about the Celtics' negotiation tactics over the years.

Long story short: They're straight to the point and know exactly what they want and what they're willing to give up. So I think that lines up with what you just wrote. There's no harm in letting teams know what you're looking for.

Yeah, it's not a bad tactic. Rather than calling each individual team about specific players - losing leverage in the process, he can let GMs come to him asking if he might be interested in a player that may be on the block. He can gain negotiating power this way, meaning possibly fewer assets going out.

I think there are any number of players Danny would trade for, but I have no doubt he will go for the best value.