Westbrook has obviously been a disaster and Beal is obviously a great player, but without Wall, Washington has been at best a bad team (and often horrid) even despite Beal putting up huge numbers. I guess I'm just wondering if Beal is an empty stats type player without the cover of someone like Wall (who was obviously a very good player in before the injuries). I guess I'm just not sure Beal would be the right player for the cost it will take to acquire him (and I don't mean in Boston, since Boston doesn't have the assets to do it, just in general).