Any 3 Smart takes is a bad shot because it means the significantly better shooters aren't taking those shots.
So if Tatum gets doubled at the elbow with under 5 seconds on the clock and swings it to a wide-open Smart in the corner.... you’re saying you rather Tatum take a contested long two or make a telegraphed lob to someone else than have an average shooter take the shot? Okkkk.
Generally speaking, yes. Smart is a bad shooter and every shot he takes is a shot that a better shooter is not taking. And perhaps the reason that Tatum is doubled and Smart is wide open is because the other team knows it is a bad shot and they give it to him because they want him to take it. That is just playing the odds and percentages. And Smart is not an average shooter, he is a below average shooter. He shot 34.7% last year, league average was 35.8% and Boston shot 36.4% with Smart (36.7% without Smart). So the rest of the team was a full 2% better than Smart last year. Tatum, Hayward, Walker, and Brown were all over 38% (Tatum was 40.3%). Those are the guys that should have been taking the shots.
Now to be fair, if Smart was shooting around 2 a game, no one would care because that would keep a defense honest, but the reality is, every 3 point shot Smart takes just means the better shooters aren't taking them and that is always going to be a problem.