Author Topic: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20  (Read 61143 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #450 on: January 20, 2020, 09:52:05 PM »

Offline Somebody

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7819
  • Tommy Points: 562
  • STAND FIRM, SAY NO TO VIBE MEN
Celtics win games one of two ways - either red-hot streaky shooting or they just out-work, out-hustle the other team. So, as we have seen many times, if we are not shooting well, we have no inside game to turn to and we have a good defense, but it requires lots of energy to be effective. no shooting and little effort = Loss. You get one or the other, I'd say 60% chance to win. Of course, those nights when we are playing with high energy and intense effort and shooting it well, we become a top 3 team in the league.

Tonite vs Lakers, we are playing with energy and grit and shooting a decent %, though not off the charts. Lakers out-shooting us, but effort is getting it done so far - Can we maintain this energy ?
Are you watching this game? Boston's inside game has been excellent. Kanter 18/8

Yep, I'm watching. Are you ? typical comment - Kanter has scored off offensive rebounds and in-close slip passes for little layups. That is not a post player making an offensive move and shot over a defender.
You can't be watching this game. Celtics are killing the Lakers on the boards, have more offensive rebounds and lead the Lakers in points in the paint. Boston's inside game has been outstanding.
His definition of an inside game are Duncan-esque post ups that have bigs pounding the ball under the basket every possession.
Which would be an ok strategy ... if we had a talent like Duncan
I'd rather have Garnett scaling up with the Jays, Kemba and Hayward with excellent outside shooting and GOAT level big man passing :laugh:
I'd settle for any all-time 7 footer to be honest.
True, beggars can't be choosers.
Jaylen Brown for All-NBA

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #451 on: January 20, 2020, 09:52:18 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
It's funny how people were treating the Lakers big men like they are the boogey man, yet Kanter thoroughly outplayed all three of them.
It's over when Cousins comes back! ;D
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #452 on: January 20, 2020, 09:52:34 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
Poirier!
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #453 on: January 20, 2020, 09:52:45 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32316
  • Tommy Points: 10098
even Poirier's in the books.  LA nightmare

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #454 on: January 20, 2020, 09:53:05 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Good hustle Hayward!
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #455 on: January 20, 2020, 09:53:06 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 51955
  • Tommy Points: 3186
And then Green!
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

Check out my Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Yakin_Bassin/shorts

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #456 on: January 20, 2020, 09:53:25 PM »

Offline Somebody

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7819
  • Tommy Points: 562
  • STAND FIRM, SAY NO TO VIBE MEN
Celtics win games one of two ways - either red-hot streaky shooting or they just out-work, out-hustle the other team. So, as we have seen many times, if we are not shooting well, we have no inside game to turn to and we have a good defense, but it requires lots of energy to be effective. no shooting and little effort = Loss. You get one or the other, I'd say 60% chance to win. Of course, those nights when we are playing with high energy and intense effort and shooting it well, we become a top 3 team in the league.

Tonite vs Lakers, we are playing with energy and grit and shooting a decent %, though not off the charts. Lakers out-shooting us, but effort is getting it done so far - Can we maintain this energy ?
Are you watching this game? Boston's inside game has been excellent. Kanter 18/8

Yep, I'm watching. Are you ? typical comment - Kanter has scored off offensive rebounds and in-close slip passes for little layups. That is not a post player making an offensive move and shot over a defender.
You can't be watching this game. Celtics are killing the Lakers on the boards, have more offensive rebounds and lead the Lakers in points in the paint. Boston's inside game has been outstanding.
His definition of an inside game are Duncan-esque post ups that have bigs pounding the ball under the basket every possession.
Which would be an ok strategy ... if we had a talent like Duncan

According to analytics that the Ringer posted, the post up is actually the lowest value shot that an NBA player can make these days. Unless of yourself you’re Duncan or Shaq.

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/12/2/20991249/post-up-dead-nba-brooklyn-nets-joel-embiid
Or Garnett, his post up numbers are eerily similar to Duncan's aside from drawing fouls.
Jaylen Brown for All-NBA

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #457 on: January 20, 2020, 09:53:28 PM »

Offline ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18745
  • Tommy Points: 1527
Let’s get our garbage time crew on and protect these guys from injury
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #458 on: January 20, 2020, 09:53:42 PM »

Offline SCeltic34

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17994
  • Tommy Points: 2339
Gino Time
Tacko Time

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #459 on: January 20, 2020, 09:53:46 PM »

Offline BringToughnessBack

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8700
  • Tommy Points: 1038
Howard can’t stop our foreign center!

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #460 on: January 20, 2020, 09:54:23 PM »

Offline tstorey_97

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3667
  • Tommy Points: 586
Poirier and Green...gracious, the rout is on

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #461 on: January 20, 2020, 09:54:32 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37076
  • Tommy Points: 3380
  • On To Banner 19!
GINO TIME. Get Tacko out there
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #462 on: January 20, 2020, 09:54:40 PM »

Offline Somebody

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7819
  • Tommy Points: 562
  • STAND FIRM, SAY NO TO VIBE MEN
 Nice to see Poirier playing, I think he can still be a decent NBA centre.
Jaylen Brown for All-NBA

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #463 on: January 20, 2020, 09:54:57 PM »

Offline apc

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4310
  • Tommy Points: 437
Not the same but this game took me back to 2008 finals .

Re: Lakers (34-8) at Celtics (27-14) Game #42 1/20/20
« Reply #464 on: January 20, 2020, 09:55:37 PM »

Offline ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18745
  • Tommy Points: 1527
Celtics win games one of two ways - either red-hot streaky shooting or they just out-work, out-hustle the other team. So, as we have seen many times, if we are not shooting well, we have no inside game to turn to and we have a good defense, but it requires lots of energy to be effective. no shooting and little effort = Loss. You get one or the other, I'd say 60% chance to win. Of course, those nights when we are playing with high energy and intense effort and shooting it well, we become a top 3 team in the league.

Tonite vs Lakers, we are playing with energy and grit and shooting a decent %, though not off the charts. Lakers out-shooting us, but effort is getting it done so far - Can we maintain this energy ?
Are you watching this game? Boston's inside game has been excellent. Kanter 18/8

Yep, I'm watching. Are you ? typical comment - Kanter has scored off offensive rebounds and in-close slip passes for little layups. That is not a post player making an offensive move and shot over a defender.
You can't be watching this game. Celtics are killing the Lakers on the boards, have more offensive rebounds and lead the Lakers in points in the paint. Boston's inside game has been outstanding.
His definition of an inside game are Duncan-esque post ups that have bigs pounding the ball under the basket every possession.
Which would be an ok strategy ... if we had a talent like Duncan

According to analytics that the Ringer posted, the post up is actually the lowest value shot that an NBA player can make these days. Unless of yourself you’re Duncan or Shaq.

https://www.theringer.com/nba/2019/12/2/20991249/post-up-dead-nba-brooklyn-nets-joel-embiid
Or Garnett, his post up numbers are eerily similar to Duncan's aside from drawing fouls.

Exactly. And it begs the question,is the post up dead because it’s a low value shot, or is it because there are no good players who can execute it because those players have been all conditioned to shoot 3s in AAU ball growing up?
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D