The bench debate has been underway here for awhile now. Ainge, doesn't see a problem.
Last year against the Bucks, the Celtics were a different team, I've got that, it's just the Bucks rotated the daylights out of the Celtics with a good bench.
Will it happen again? I hope not, but, the Bucks still run deeper than the Celtics and no, there probably wasn't anything Ainge could do about it.
The below will have to be the "why" Ainge didn't see a trade.
The bench, when the starters are healthy which is essentially...never:
Smart (really a starter)
Kanter
Wanamaker
Grant
Semi
If healthy, the Celtic's "big 4" usually have two on the court in combination with this bunch with Smart being included.
In the last weeks, Kanter has been great. We don't know if he'll be effective against the Bucks, but, why not?
Wanamaker has been good. His turnovers are down and his shooting is ok.
Grant has played in 48 NBA games averaging 15 minutes. After setting a record for most consecutive missed three pointers, his shooting is good.
Semi has been solid. In 10 games, he is 5 of 18 from three, but, 15 of 34 from the field. He is a top defender here and will be assigned the freak if the time comes for the limited minutes he gets.
"Our bench doesn't score" because they are on the court with four all stars and we let the all stars do all the shooting in Boston because life isn't fair along with that's how you win games.
My guess is trader Danny is aok with the Theis/Kanter two headed monster this year. Frequent frontcourt rotations include Semi at 6'6" and Grant at 6'6" and a 6' 9 3/4" wingspan which is one and a quarter inches shorter than Romeo Langford's wingspan at 6' 11".
They will have to play big.
Last night the Magic, tops in NBA defense at 104.8/pg, lost to the Celtics who are the second best defense in the NBA 105.4/pg. The difference was the Celtics just "have too many players who can score."
In the meantime, league topping defense along with the "big 4" shooting the lights out might make trader Danny look like a genius.