Poll

Who would you rather have

Jaylen Brown
50 (89.3%)
Domantas Sabonis
6 (10.7%)

Total Members Voted: 56

Author Topic: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown  (Read 6425 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2020, 04:27:04 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Why?

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #31 on: January 08, 2020, 04:41:42 PM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6704
  • Tommy Points: 651
Currently, 31-3 in favor of Brown. 

That's pretty decisive and one-sided.

Yea surprised it was so one sided TBH

Does Brown for Sabonis + 10 mil/year cap space change anyone's opinion? I assume it doesn't.

Swapping Sabonis for Brown doesn't give us 10 million in cap space. This team is likely to be over the cap for the foreseeable future (assuming we retain Hayward, extend Tatum), so freeing up what is actually 7.5 million a year (77 million vs 107 million with the likely incentives divided by 4 years) doesn't really offer any extra salary cap room.

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #32 on: January 08, 2020, 05:12:41 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8876
  • Tommy Points: 290
Shouldn't the focus be Hayward or Smart with picks for Sabonis. We want to build with the Js.

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #33 on: January 08, 2020, 05:23:12 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Shouldn't the focus be Hayward or Smart with picks for Sabonis. We want to build with the Js.

But then the real question is, why would the Pacers take Hayward for Sabonis?

Also, it seems like TJ Warren has been balling out for them, so their isn't that much need of GH.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #34 on: January 08, 2020, 05:30:38 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8876
  • Tommy Points: 290
Shouldn't the focus be Hayward or Smart with picks for Sabonis. We want to build with the Js.

But then the real question is, why would the Pacers take Hayward for Sabonis?

Also, it seems like TJ Warren has been balling out for them, so their isn't that much need of GH.
Three team trade is an option. Move Hayward for a PF that can stretch the floor.

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #35 on: January 08, 2020, 05:33:40 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Shouldn't the focus be Hayward or Smart with picks for Sabonis. We want to build with the Js.

But then the real question is, why would the Pacers take Hayward for Sabonis?

Also, it seems like TJ Warren has been balling out for them, so their isn't that much need of GH.
Three team trade is an option. Move Hayward for a PF that can stretch the floor.

For who? Us, or the Pacers?
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #36 on: January 08, 2020, 05:36:53 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8876
  • Tommy Points: 290
Shouldn't the focus be Hayward or Smart with picks for Sabonis. We want to build with the Js.

But then the real question is, why would the Pacers take Hayward for Sabonis?

Also, it seems like TJ Warren has been balling out for them, so their isn't that much need of GH.
Three team trade is an option. Move Hayward for a PF that can stretch the floor.

For who? Us, or the Pacers?
Pacers but I suppose C's could do the same and then slot Tatum at SF if they were worried about resigning Hayward.

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #37 on: January 08, 2020, 06:50:15 PM »

Offline MichiganAdam

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 260
  • Tommy Points: 16
C's are likely to do a little complementary trade to consolodate a 2 or 3 for 1 to free up roster spots for next offseason and get a 10-12th on roster type big or high end bench shooter rather than have to cut guys for nothing in the offseason.  I hope they can get someone who can at least help a little.  Also frees up a spot for buy outs.

Re: Revisiting Sabonis for Brown
« Reply #38 on: January 08, 2020, 07:07:42 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15241
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
C's are likely to do a little complementary trade to consolodate a 2 or 3 for 1 to free up roster spots for next offseason and get a 10-12th on roster type big or high end bench shooter rather than have to cut guys for nothing in the offseason.  I hope they can get someone who can at least help a little.  Also frees up a spot for buy outs.
I hope so, but why do you think that is likely?