Obviously quite different games, with VanVleet being a more natural shooter and scorer, while Waters is a better defender and passer. But the comparison, at least in my head, comes from them both being undersized and overlooked guards.
Waters has a beautiful stroke, and judging by what sample size we’ve got, he’s accurate as well.
On the other hand, VanVleet is a very good defender.
I think that your comparisons are a bit off the cuff.
How do you figure that Fred is undersized?
What sample size is that? I like Waters, but his 3P shooting in college wasn't particularly good. Granted, he is looking better here, but the edge would still have to go to VanVleet.
College %s aren't going to tell you a whole lot, nor are comparisons between NBA veterans and rookies in pre-season. I'm also not arguing that Waters is actually better, rather that we don't have a whole lot to go on - even if we did, it wouldn't tell us much. 3-pt%s are especially volatile, and in the end there is NEVER enough of a sample size.
Waters will be a good 3-pt shooter. Looks like he could get some minutes at some point this year; if he shoots .300, well and good - but that won't give you much of a clue as to who of Fred and Tremont is a better shooter.
Waters was also the SEC Defensive Player of the Year, whereas VanVleet had no defensive accolades during his college career.
You're reasoning that Waters is a better NBA defender, not having yet played any NBA minutes - than Fred VanVleet, who was a plus defender in the NBA Finals this past year - because he got an accolade in college that Fred didn't?
Consider that their defensive games are different (in your words "obviously quite different"), and while Tremont has a chance to be a really good NBA defender, despite his size, his great hands and the ability to steal the ball from the man he's guarding are more obvious defensive skills than: being in the right place at the right time, bumping the roll man, not helping one pass away, and all the other things that make a player a great defender (but fans never notice) - and so are more likely to get college accolades.
And my comparison wasn't really to do with actual play style, but more impact. I even said in the OP Obviously quite different games
I was only addressing the comparisons you made in your post. I agree with you that their play styles are different.
I figure that VanVleet is undersized because he is measured at 6' prior to the new measurement system being implemented. 6' full-stop is undersized - not sure how you could argue otherwise.
So you're only looking at height. But "size" is more than that. Consider that mass and strength are if anything more important for an NBA player playing defense, and for doing things like driving into the paint with the ball. And weight is a good, if imperfect, proxy for strength.
By that measure Fred is comfortably above average. Here're most of the rotation point guards by weight:
VanVleet 195
Kemba 184
Rubio 190
Rondo 186
Mike Conley 175
Ja Morant 175
Lonzo 190
Quinn Cook 179
Steph 190
D’Angelo 198
Patrick Beverley 185
Landry Shamet 190
De’Aaron Fox 185
Tyler Ulis 160
Shai 181
Chris Paul 175
Schröder 172
Frank Mason III 190
George Hill 188
Bledsoe 208
Cory Joseph 200
Yogi Ferrell 180
Rozier 190
Trae Young 180
Derrick Rose 200
Reggie Jackson 208
Kyle Lowry 196
Shabazz Napier 180
Jeff Teague 195
Damian Lillard 195
Mudiay 200
Patty Mills 180
Derrick White 190
Dejounte 170
DJ Augustin 183
MCW 190
Ish Smith 180
Isaiah Thomas 185
John Wall 210
Kyrie 195
Dennis Smith 196
Elfrid Payton 185