These reports coming out about Rozier's attitude that sucked all year and now the team not being happy with Tatum makes you wonder about how much fans really think they know.
Brown spoke out against Kyrie. Brown was the player getting lectured by others publicly on the court. Brown struggled hard at the beginning of the season. Brown was accused of having low BBIQ. Brown was benched.
For a good part of the season it appeared to fans like Brown was a problem. Come the end of the year, now that stuff is leaking out, it appears Rozier and Tatum were the problem, that Brown appears to be the player with the highest BBIQ and that Brown has grown his game and was one of the team's two best playoff performers. Brown was playing the best basketball of his career the last 2 1/2 months
Meanwhile Tatum and Rozier regressed or plateaued and were weak to bad playoff performers. They sound like they were a problem in the locker room and yet, we never heard anything about the team having concerns or problems with them until now.
Rozier is gone. And if some of these reports are any indication, the team will be more than happy to keep Brown in a trade for Davis and send Tatum out.
I agree, going to quote what I wrote in another thread.
Yeah I simply don't understand the Kyrie detractors... Yes, was he a prima donna? Check. Did he take reckless dumb shots, especially that heavily contested stepback fadeaway on Giannis at the left side? Check. Was he on and off with media, and hinting at his displeasure at how the team was, and not stepping up as a leader? Check.
But he's a top 25 player, that hasn't even eclipsed his prime... Also we would have his bird rights, which means we can go over the cap, and re-sign, and trade him later on in the future... There is NO point in letting Kyrie just walk away for nothing...
That being said, I'm just befuddled as to what really happened... I'm sure we will find out more information in the future about why the downfall of our team, and our chemistry fluctuated. But Kyrie wasn't like this last year... This is why I'm so confused. I have to believe the usual suspects were probably Tatum, (his comments saying that he thinks he could be the 'man,' in NOP,) Rozier for his disparaging commentary regarding his 'role.' And finally Morris who said he wasn't happy about his role, and believed he should be starting.
I just don't get it. I really think making ECF last year might've been the worst thing for our young players... Instead of working hard to build on their weaknesses, they took it as, "let me just chuck the most 3's," and hope everything falls into place.
Anyways, getting back on topic, I'm okay with Bradley Beal, but at what cost?
Not giving up Tatum or Brown for him, Beal is a great player, and All-star, but if I'm giving up Tatum or Brown, I'm expecting someone that can momentously change the tide of the game. Is Beal that type of player?
I think Rozier took his coming off bench as an insult. (As if he's better than Smart, Brown, or Hayward.) Scary Terry really got to his head.
And I think Tatum was convinced he was a superstar in the making. Lazy defense this year, stayed away from spot up/catch and shoot 3's, and generally just took awful shots. His shot selection was not only terrible, but he refused to drive for contact/FTA's. I think sophomore slump, trade rumors, and him claiming that he could be the go to guy or 'man,' at NOP messed him up.
Agree with all of this which is why "ugh, Kyrie's a cancer" is a flawed narrative to me. The idea that he was bothered by the playoff run last year is also a flawed narrative because we all saw the enthusiasm he came in with to start this season. Again, Kyrie had a ton of blame here but there's plenty to go around; from Danny not realizing that he needed to trade Rozier and bring in a vet off the bench who understood and accepted his role, to Brad not making guys comfortable in their roles and rushing an unproven Hayward back into the starting line-up (because I do think that ruffled some feathers), to the players for not coming together for each other - this thing was an organizational failure.
Totally agree, I felt like Brown, Smart, and Baynes/Horford were also scapegoats this year. People were complaining that Horford looked a step slower, and were wary of him exercising his player option, and as we all witnessed... He did work in the playoffs as usual. People also claimed Baynes was injury prone, (I think I agree, but he's also a bruiser and on the wrong side of 30.)
Smart and Brown were also judged unfairly beginning of the season, and Smart eventually won his haters by averaging his best 3P %. And we already know what Brown has accomplished.
That being said, I do want Irving/Morris back on our team. Morris has moxie, even if his shot selection is terribad at times.
Hayward shouldn't have ever started. I think we all agreed that Hayward wasn't ready, and starting him would annoy and create some friction in the locker room.