There is no obsession with those guys.
Obviously I'm guilty of overblown rhetoric - "obsession" is a psychiatric term, and that doesn't apply to EVERY poster who proposes yet another trade for one of these guys...
In all seriousness, I don't mean to antagonize you - sometimes I forget that there are actual people on the other end of the Internet.
I also think IT is somewhat overrated. He is a good player and our primary scorer and I'd be hesitant to trade him but most of what you say is false.
What I said is that he's one of the top pnr ballhandlers in the league. Surely that's not a controversial statement? And if you trade him, you'd better replace him.
Okafor is also a good passer in a bad situation.
The most charitable interpretation is that he's a non-passer who's risk-averse: low passing turnovers AND low assists also - when he gets the ball, it's going up. The bigger world of that is how badly his game suits the NBA in 2016, but more to the point how badly his game suits Brad Stevens' Celtics. No doubt, he's a worker - obsessive, if you'll allow the word. No doubt there is upside.
Noel is also underrated that way.
His TOV% is over 18. No, you do not want to give him the ball. You do not want to run offense through him in any sense.
Both young players with some growing to do but with Horford here they would be allowed to do that.
So Brett Brown was not allowing them to grow? Hard to agree with that, since they both got major minutes. As a rookie, Okafor got 30 mins/game despite having the worst real plus-minus among all centers. Frankly, he was awful on both ends. It's a team game, and despite his obvious skills he has a long way to go before he's helping a team win.
I just think being aggressive here is not a bad idea.
I agree.
Okafor is not a specialty player. He is a developing young big man. So is Noel for that matter.
Okafor is a post-up specialist. You can't run pnr with him. You give him the ball and he does his thing, eating clock and holding on to the ball. Trading Thomas for him is doubly disastrous - say goodbye to "pace and space", high-tempo basketball. Apart from the gaping holes in his game, Okafor is a bad fit for Ainge/Stevens' vision of a modern ball- and man-movement offense.
Noel is a defensive specialist. As young as he is, he has a positive impact on team defense. He's more than a shot-blocker. But his offense is a deal-breaker if you want a guy who can play in a ball-movement offense.
Ainge himself tried to trade up to get Okafor.
Did HE say that? I'm skeptical about it, and about all such claims. Got a link?
Assumptions are funny though. How people respond is also telling. Way ahead of you in ways. I have a mind of my own.
And no lack of confidence, apparently! Thanks for the dialogue.