I really think Horford is a bit overrated. Sure, he is a quality big, better than what we have. But is he a franchise changer?
He will not improve anymore, I think we can agree on that. For the money he is probably asking, is he worth signing? I think he is not. Within a few years his playing time will decrease because of age. Even though he hasn't been relying on athleticism he will get slower, with less ups. His rebounding numbers aren't impressing as it is, and those will probably only get down.
The star of Atlanta is Paul Millsap, I think anyone will agree. What has Horford brought the Hawks true the years? Last season was his best result, and one can argue that he was the 3th or 4th best player of their season. Teague and Millsap were the stars, Korver was shooting out of his mind.
I think Horford is a third best player on a class team. He was third behind Joe Johnson and Josh Smith in 2008, and he is third now behind Millsap and Teague.
Third on a team that finished with the same record as ours. Is that worth throwing a 20 million+ offer to? Will he really make us that much better? He is a solid shooting big man, and we could really use that, but to me Horford is not the solution.
But maybe I will admit I'm very wrong about him after the playoff series. We (and Danny) have at least 4 games to see If Horford is really that good.