Author Topic: Danny was right  (Read 8736 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2014, 03:32:40 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Quote from: manl_lui link=topic=74099.msg1755471#msgth1755471 date=1415124968
Just for reference

Kobe Bryant's first career game was November 3, 1996.  He played a whopping 6 minutes, didn't score a point (he was 0-1), had 1 rebound, 1 block, 1 turnover, and 1 foul.  He followed that up on November 5th with a whopping 3 minutes of game action again going 0-1, but was 1-2 from the line scoring his first point.  He added 1 turnover, but had no other stats.  Played 7 minutes on November 6th, had 3 turnovers, but was 2 of 3 from the field (including 1 of 2 from three) for a whopping 5 points. 

In other words, in Kobe's first 3 games he played 16 minutes, was 2 of 3 from two, 1 of 2 from three, 1 of 2 from the line for 6 points, adding in 1 rebound, 1 block, with 5 turnovers and 1 foul.  He didn't have an assist or a steal. 

Not exactly the stellar start to a career that one would expect from a player that will retire as one of the greatest SG's the game has ever seen.

Yep. 19 year olds are going to struggle against pros in their primes. In this era of freshman turning pro, you need a few years before you can really evaluate a draft. I think this class will go down as one of the good ones.

And i think most posters on this board were under the impression that this class was full of star POTENTIAL. No Lebron's. But maybe a couple Mcgrady or Zack Randolph's eventually.

if McGrady was fully healthy, no injuries whatsoever, do you think he would be better? on par? or still gets destroyed by LeBron?

I mean McGrady in his prime was arguably a top 10 player

I still think Lebron destroys him most of the time. I put Lebron in that special category with Shaq and Duncan. Those guys were dominators.

Sadly we never saw McGrady perform late into the playoffs. He was great in his prime. But i thought there wasn't a heck of a lot of separation between Kobe, Pierce, prime Ray Allen, McGrady, and Vince Carter. All those guys were beasts and one upped each other in one skill or another.

If you want to sub out the name McGrady in my post thats cool. Maybe sub in Joe Johnson, Rip Hamilton, Klay Thompson or some other lesser all star level guard.

I know I'll get hate for this,  but I put Lebron in a level above Duncan.

I put Lebron in the Jordan/Kobe category - the best player in the league in his prime.

Sorry,  but I don't put Duncan on that level.  Duncan never really came close to dominating the game the way guys like Shaq, Hakeem, Robinson, Magic, Bird did in their primes.  He was more on Kg/Ewing/ Pippen/Wilkens level. Duncan is always judged based on his team's achievements rather than his own,  but the truth is every team he played on was pretty stacked, and he's had the luxury of playng under an all time great coach his entire career.

If you judge his individual achievements he was obviously a great player,  but not transcendence or dominant the way people like to claim.   Statistically  KG, Barkley and Malone all had more impressive careers.

Lebron, much as I dislike him,  has completely changed the face and culture of the nba.  He will be remembered a the greatest player of a generation,  and he'll be an as a Jordan / Kobe like talent one his career winds to a close.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2014, 03:40:47 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
I agree with a lot of that post, but Kobe was never the best player in the league during his prime. That's the real difference between Bryant and Jordan, IMO.

This is, by the way, an extraordinarily interesting discussion. At least in my experience.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2014, 04:18:44 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
Just for reference: In Kevin Durant's first professional game he shot 7-22 and 50% from the line on a tanking team that was actively trying to lose games. None of the big name rookies from this class are getting the same sort leeway from their coaches.

That's probably because, in addition to being 19 years old, Durant was not only playing for PJ Carlesimo, but he was also playing out of position at SG, as he did for the entirety of his rookie campaign.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2014, 04:23:37 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
... it's been three games.

Still need to talk about something.
Have we depleted the discussion of Kelly's hairo?

Never (sarcasm)! ;D

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2014, 04:24:12 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
... it's been three games.

Still need to talk about something.
Have we depleted the discussion of Kelly's hairo?

Never (sarcasm)! ;D
I meant to type "hairdo", but I guess "hairo" is nice too :P
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2014, 04:24:23 PM »

Offline PaulAllen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1103
  • Tommy Points: 55
There has been plenty of 19-20 year old to come out of the league and make an immediate impact, yes they are usually on bad teams but dont tell me when you saw the first games of durant, melo, howard, cp3...thats just off the top of my head and currently playing

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #36 on: November 04, 2014, 04:25:41 PM »

Offline Beat LA

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8338
  • Tommy Points: 896
  • Mr. Emoji
... it's been three games.

Still need to talk about something.

talk is talk.... and we're talking about kids under 21 who just started playing pro ball. Give them some time.

I never expected these guys to be LBJ right off the bat.
no, but the handful of people screaming for the team to absolutely tank last year (and this one) thought those players would be LBJ. 

The draft is how to add cheap talent that will hopefully develop into solid/great players depending on where you pick them.  thing is, almost all of them need 2-3 years (or more) of seasoning to reach that level and by then they are no longer cheap if they reach the level you hope for.

good point - I think everyone was expecting Wiggins and Parker to come out and be like Kobe or LeBron straight up, or Embiid to be Hakeem

these kids have so much pressure thrown on them it's crazy. In a way, aren't you glad Smart isn't getting as much hype but is contributing quietly

and [dang], that behind the back pass by Marcus yesterday deserves to be on NBA top 10 play!
I'm liking the "Smart" pick more and more with each passing game.   the kid impacts a game with his D even more than AB did when he first saw court time.   I'm hoping he can improve his shot like AB did.  I don't see him ever in Rondo's league as a PG or ballhandler but I'm very happy we have this kid.  I think back to the draft with a number of individuals bemoaning the fact we didn't take Randle, Vonleh or Stauskas.  Not seeing how anyone can really be disappointed in this pick at this point.

even Young looks like a very solid prospect taken late in the draft.  someone taken after him may indeed turn out better but I haven't seen anything in his game to be disappointed in yet or that would make me think this kid will be a bust.

For what it's worth, KJ McDaniels has played really well so far, but, again, it's only been 3 games.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #37 on: November 04, 2014, 04:28:07 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Just for reference: In Kevin Durant's first professional game he shot 7-22 and 50% from the line on a tanking team that was actively trying to lose games. None of the big name rookies from this class are getting the same sort leeway from their coaches.

That's probably because, in addition to being 19 years old, Durant was not only playing for PJ Carlesimo, but he was also playing out of position at SG, as he did for the entirety of his rookie campaign.

The point is, though, that the 'immediate impact' is generally overstated. Tyreke Evans had one of the best rookie seasons in recent memory, after all.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #38 on: November 04, 2014, 04:30:03 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33135
  • Tommy Points: 1743
  • What a Pub Should Be
Elfrid Payton is the kid that's really jumped out at me so far.  Good test for him tonight against the Bulls. 

His shooting has been off but he's been quite the facilitator out there on offense and seems pretty composed for a 20 year old rookie PG.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #39 on: November 04, 2014, 05:37:39 PM »

Offline Onslaught

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1768
  • Tommy Points: 156
... it's been three games.

Still need to talk about something.

talk is talk.... and we're talking about kids under 21 who just started playing pro ball. Give them some time.

I never expected these guys to be LBJ right off the bat.
I hope you never expect them to ever be close to LBJ. Because I don't see that happening. I always felt this draft was WAY, WAAAAYY overrated.
Peace through Tyranny

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #40 on: November 04, 2014, 06:11:30 PM »

Offline TheFlex

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2791
  • Tommy Points: 367
Quote from: manl_lui link=topic=74099.msg1755471#msgth1755471 date=1415124968
Just for reference

Kobe Bryant's first career game was November 3, 1996.  He played a whopping 6 minutes, didn't score a point (he was 0-1), had 1 rebound, 1 block, 1 turnover, and 1 foul.  He followed that up on November 5th with a whopping 3 minutes of game action again going 0-1, but was 1-2 from the line scoring his first point.  He added 1 turnover, but had no other stats.  Played 7 minutes on November 6th, had 3 turnovers, but was 2 of 3 from the field (including 1 of 2 from three) for a whopping 5 points. 

In other words, in Kobe's first 3 games he played 16 minutes, was 2 of 3 from two, 1 of 2 from three, 1 of 2 from the line for 6 points, adding in 1 rebound, 1 block, with 5 turnovers and 1 foul.  He didn't have an assist or a steal. 

Not exactly the stellar start to a career that one would expect from a player that will retire as one of the greatest SG's the game has ever seen.

Yep. 19 year olds are going to struggle against pros in their primes. In this era of freshman turning pro, you need a few years before you can really evaluate a draft. I think this class will go down as one of the good ones.

And i think most posters on this board were under the impression that this class was full of star POTENTIAL. No Lebron's. But maybe a couple Mcgrady or Zack Randolph's eventually.

if McGrady was fully healthy, no injuries whatsoever, do you think he would be better? on par? or still gets destroyed by LeBron?

I mean McGrady in his prime was arguably a top 10 player

I still think Lebron destroys him most of the time. I put Lebron in that special category with Shaq and Duncan. Those guys were dominators.

Sadly we never saw McGrady perform late into the playoffs. He was great in his prime. But i thought there wasn't a heck of a lot of separation between Kobe, Pierce, prime Ray Allen, McGrady, and Vince Carter. All those guys were beasts and one upped each other in one skill or another.

If you want to sub out the name McGrady in my post thats cool. Maybe sub in Joe Johnson, Rip Hamilton, Klay Thompson or some other lesser all star level guard.

I know I'll get hate for this,  but I put Lebron in a level above Duncan.

I put Lebron in the Jordan/Kobe category - the best player in the league in his prime.

Sorry,  but I don't put Duncan on that level.  Duncan never really came close to dominating the game the way guys like Shaq, Hakeem, Robinson, Magic, Bird did in their primes.  He was more on Kg/Ewing/ Pippen/Wilkens level. Duncan is always judged based on his team's achievements rather than his own,  but the truth is every team he played on was pretty stacked, and he's had the luxury of playng under an all time great coach his entire career.

If you judge his individual achievements he was obviously a great player,  but not transcendence or dominant the way people like to claim.   Statistically  KG, Barkley and Malone all had more impressive careers.

Lebron, much as I dislike him,  has completely changed the face and culture of the nba.  He will be remembered a the greatest player of a generation,  and he'll be an as a Jordan / Kobe like talent one his career winds to a close.

If we're talking about an individual season to measure dominance in one's prime, I have to put KG up there with Shaq (both of whom would be top ten players ever if such rankings were only based off of their single best season). KG's '03-04 season was unreal. He was a man amongst boys, and there were plenty of talented boys in the league that year. Duncan has had a fantastic career -- a better one than Garnett, probably -- and plenty of elite individual seasons, but I don't know if he had a year like KG in '03-04 or Shaq in '99-00.

I'm open to being proven wrong.


Draft: 8 first rounders in next 5 years.

Cap space: $24 mil.

https://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague/

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #41 on: November 04, 2014, 06:32:39 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
... it's been three games.

Still need to talk about something.
Have we depleted the discussion of Kelly's hairo?

Never (sarcasm)! ;D
I meant to type "hairdo", but I guess "hairo" is nice too :P

It's ok, Kelly has trouble with "d" too.

Re: Danny was right
« Reply #42 on: November 04, 2014, 06:36:48 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18383
  • Tommy Points: 2764
  • bammokja
... it's been three games.

Still need to talk about something.
Have we depleted the discussion of Kelly's hairo?

Never (sarcasm)! ;D
I meant to type "hairdo", but I guess "hairo" is nice too :P

It's ok, Kelly has trouble with "d" too.
good one. tp for ya.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva