I can't help but think where we have improved our roster. Checking the important areas like the starters and regular rotation players
Rondo is Rondo
Bradley is Bradley
Olynyk is Olynyk
Sullinger is Sullinger
Green is Green
Bass is Bass
Wallace is Wallace
Faverani is Faverani
Anthony is Anthony
Zeller is worse than Humphries
Smart might be better than the Crawford/Bayless combo but he might not
And we added Turner, a horribly inefficient scorer that's a bit of a wing tweener that got little playing time in Indiana and possibly for good reason.
Yeah Rondo could play better and the youth could grow but none of that is a certain. Its not like a star player was added or a rim protecting rebounding big man, things this team definitely needs to get better.
I think to make the playoffs this team is going to need about a 15-20 game improvement, meaning it would be one of the larger single season improvements in league history. Does anyone really think this team changed so much that a 15-20 win turnaround is possible?
I just don't see it. What I see is a team that does what teams have been doing in the league since its inception when they do not add significant star talent to a team and are relying strictly on player growth, a marginal improvement at best. That's what the numbers say and I'm sticking with those numbers.
Celtics will probably win between 25-31 games and miss the playoffs....again.