0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
By declining the option now his cap hold goes up some (to $2.9 million, because he met starter criteria), but the Rockets have the right to match any offer, plus it makes him a very valuable sign-and-trade piece to help get a free agent.
I have NO interest in Parsons, completely over-hyped at this point and those that will get him, if any, will regret it severely for overpaying for him.
Change thread title, please. This is NOT what the Rockets are doing.From the article: Quote By declining the option now his cap hold goes up some (to $2.9 million, because he met starter criteria), but the Rockets have the right to match any offer, plus it makes him a very valuable sign-and-trade piece to help get a free agent.
Quote from: BudweiserCeltic on June 29, 2014, 12:08:14 AMI have NO interest in Parsons, completely over-hyped at this point and those that will get him, if any, will regret it severely for overpaying for him.I agree. He would just clutter our payroll. He is a decent piece if you are one decent piece from a title team. But otherwise a salary eater.
Quote from: Lucky17 on June 29, 2014, 12:04:55 AMChange thread title, please. This is NOT what the Rockets are doing.From the article: Quote By declining the option now his cap hold goes up some (to $2.9 million, because he met starter criteria), but the Rockets have the right to match any offer, plus it makes him a very valuable sign-and-trade piece to help get a free agent.Seriously, this has been out there for awhile people. Parsons cap hold is small, less than $1.8 million, as a free agent. Declining his option makes him a restricted fee agent, and only takes up $800k more than it otherwise would have. Being a restricted free agent means the rockets can match any offer, and also means they've done parsons a favor by letting him earn what he's worth a year earlier, so he'll be more likely to want to stay. If they picked up the option, he'd be unrestricted next year, and there's a greater chance they would lose him.