Would they consider scal, bbd, tony, giddens, hudson, first roudner
for
Maggette, Randolph?
The only real drawback here is that it would disrupt postential cap space in the 2012 offseason...but with everyone around here willing to throw 3 year deals at ray and pierce, that's a pipe dream anyway. So upon considering that fact, Maggette is a surprisingly good player. he can play either wing spot, wouldn't complain with the 30 mpg behind pierce/allen (averaging 26 or so now), and is efficient offensively and draws tons of fouls. He'd be a great wing backup. Assuming that Ray and Rondo make the same amount combined next year as this year (i.e. if ray drops to about 10 mil per year) and we trade our expirings for maggette, we'd essentially have the same payroll next year as this year with a better roster. Have to seriously consider it if this is what it took to add a guy with huge potential in Randolph to our team, a team that has basically no chance at getting a good draft prospect in the near future
this would leave us with a bench of wallace, house danials, maggette, randolph, williams and walker.
the first 5 start in some towns.
also sets us up for the post big 3 era with a core of perk, rondo and randolph. wow.
down side is we have maggette and his contract to deal with. how bad does it handcuff us down the road?
If we couldn't trade him for a shorter deal, then Maggette alone means that we could only create enough cap room in 2012 summer for one max free agent, with a little left over:
Rondo
Maggette
Max guy
Filler/minimum
Perk
Randolph will have to have been resigned by then, so we would essentially have about:
Rondo
Maggette
Someone
Randolph
Perk
with about say 8-15 million in cap room, depending on many variables. Very rough estimate.
So that 4th year on Maggette's contract could definitely disrupt free agent plans.
HOWEVER. As soon as you extend Ray past 2012 (meaning, after this year, any contract longer than 2 years) and Pierce (meaning, after his contract is over, anything more than a 1 year deal) and add a MLE guy or two to keep our current core competitive, we're getting close to that limit anyway.
That's one reason why Maggette/Randolph is intriguing. We wouldn't need Shelden back, we'd be fine without Daniels; if, for the rest of this year and the next 2 (until KG's contract is up) we have a basis of:
Rondo/House
Ray/Maggette
Pierce/Maggette
KG/Randolph
Perk/Sheed
we wouldn't need anything but minimum players and we'd have an excellent, dynamic team.
Essentially, Danny should decide right now if KG's year of expiration is going to mark the new era. If not, and he's already committed to extending Ray and Pierce at deserved money (i.e. 3/30 each or so, which i think is actually quite a bit more than Ray would get on the free agent market), a trade like this would be ideal. However, Danny could also decide that he's playing a hard line with 2012, and won't add anything that goes beyond that date; if so, read here:
http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=33584.msg634362#msg634362