Author Topic: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM  (Read 7837 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #15 on: July 29, 2009, 01:08:08 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
Since we can sign Daniels for the LLE and not give up anyone, you're essentially trading Baby for Dooling and the right to keep the LLE. This is not a good deal. Baby is worth a lot more than Doolng. But, you get a TP for doing all the math on this trade.

Thanks for the TP, but you're in err, my friend. You're trading Baby for Dooling and whoever you sign with the LLE you didn't have to spend on Daniels. Maybe it's Joe Smith, maybe it's Ike Diogu, maybe it's Iverson, maybe it's Bruce Bowen, etc etc etc....

Somehow I don't think Iverson is signing for the LLE or coming off the bench

maybe he would, maybe he wouldn't. the point is the same. the LLE is an asset.
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #16 on: July 29, 2009, 01:08:35 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
Not sure if anyone already said this, but Memphis pulled their offer to Warrick, because they wanted some extra cap space.  I don't think they did that so they could take on the C's garbage contract.

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #17 on: July 29, 2009, 01:13:49 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
Not sure if anyone already said this, but Memphis pulled their offer to Warrick, because they wanted some extra cap space.  I don't think they did that so they could take on the C's garbage contract.

yep, they wanted flexibility, considering hakim plays a position where they're quite deep and they didn't want to pay him to sit on the bench.

that flexibility allows them to get a two guard with some potential for free here.
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #18 on: July 29, 2009, 01:17:07 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
Not sure if anyone already said this, but Memphis pulled their offer to Warrick, because they wanted some extra cap space.  I don't think they did that so they could take on the C's garbage contract.

yep, they wanted flexibility, considering hakim plays a position where they're quite deep and they didn't want to pay him to sit on the bench.

that flexibility allows them to get a two guard with some potential for free here.

What 2 guard with potential????  If you are talking about Tony Allen, that is a hell of a lot of spin.


Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #19 on: July 29, 2009, 01:51:55 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
Not sure if anyone already said this, but Memphis pulled their offer to Warrick, because they wanted some extra cap space.  I don't think they did that so they could take on the C's garbage contract.

yep, they wanted flexibility, considering hakim plays a position where they're quite deep and they didn't want to pay him to sit on the bench.

that flexibility allows them to get a two guard with some potential for free here.

What 2 guard with potential????  If you are talking about Tony Allen, that is a hell of a lot of spin.



tony allen hasn't played a meaningful role in green since he blew out his knee 2 years ago. at the time he was lighting it up on a young, bad team. he can't average 15 off the bench in lionel hollins system with meaningful minutes behind mayo and gay on a young, bad team? i'm sorry but the constant putting down on this blog doesn't change the fact that he's a talented slasher and defender.
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #20 on: July 29, 2009, 02:01:36 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
Not sure if anyone already said this, but Memphis pulled their offer to Warrick, because they wanted some extra cap space.  I don't think they did that so they could take on the C's garbage contract.

yep, they wanted flexibility, considering hakim plays a position where they're quite deep and they didn't want to pay him to sit on the bench.

that flexibility allows them to get a two guard with some potential for free here.

What 2 guard with potential????  If you are talking about Tony Allen, that is a hell of a lot of spin.



tony allen hasn't played a meaningful role in green since he blew out his knee 2 years ago. at the time he was lighting it up on a young, bad team. he can't average 15 off the bench in lionel hollins system with meaningful minutes behind mayo and gay on a young, bad team? i'm sorry but the constant putting down on this blog doesn't change the fact that he's a talented slasher and defender.

Oh, I absolutely think he could.  But I think if other GMs saw that, he would not still be on the C's.

Memphis cleared cap room for a reason.  It was not because they simply wanted to get rid of Warrick, it was because they wanted to be able to make a run at a FA, or a trade. 

While Tony would be decent for them (in that he would excite the fans and put up empty numbers), they can do MUCH better with the cap room they have.  They could turn that into a more valuable player right now, or could take on someone elses contract, in return for first round draft picks.  More likely though, they have someone targeted already, and we will find out who it is soon.

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #21 on: July 29, 2009, 03:15:15 PM »

Offline Celtic#9

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 331
  • Tommy Points: 15
Since we can sign Daniels for the LLE and not give up anyone, you're essentially trading Baby for Dooling and the right to keep the LLE. This is not a good deal. Baby is worth a lot more than Doolng. But, you get a TP for doing all the math on this trade.

Thanks for the TP, but you're in err, my friend. You're trading Baby for Dooling and whoever you sign with the LLE you didn't have to spend on Daniels. Maybe it's Joe Smith, maybe it's Ike Diogu, maybe it's Iverson, maybe it's Bruce Bowen, etc etc etc....

Somehow I don't think Iverson is signing for the LLE or coming off the bench

maybe he would, maybe he wouldn't. the point is the same. the LLE is an asset.

He already said he wouldn't but I agree completely that the LLE is a useful asset.

Re: Trade Idea - BOS / NJ / IND / MEM
« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2009, 05:20:45 PM »

Offline Rtpas11

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 803
  • Tommy Points: 76
Trade is okay, but I don't get it?

C's need a Big Man in return. Unless you're keeping Scal to play alongside Sheed.

The one I created is more preferable.