Nope. The Celtics are doing just fine revenue wise.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/286033/operating-income-of-the-boston-celtics-national-basketball-association/
By the way: 7th - Brooklyn Nets, $280 million. The Celts made $42 million more in profit last year. How are the Nets competing?
I think we’re sixth in net income. We bring in more than the vast majority of NBA franchises, more than the Nets and Heat combined. We make more than the Clippers and Sixers, and absolutely dwarf the Suns, Jazz, Nuggets and Bucks.
Money isn’t the problem. An unwillingness to spend it could become one.
Thank you for finding that information Roy.
My apologies, as yet again I haven’t articulated my thoughts correctly. I was really referring to pay the luxury tax. Just looking at the income already generated by the GSW and future income, paying a repeater tax is a drop in the ocean for them. Wyc and co are very good owners in my eyes, they’ve build a state of the art training facility and now purchased the G-League team, but their personal wealth is in the bottom 3 of NBA ownership. Michael Jordan who has previously stated he wouldn’t pay the luxury tax is worth more than Celtics ownership. Although like Roy has started the Celtics generated revenue is higher then the Nets, their owner Joseph Tsai has a net worth of 11.8 Billion. Tsai is also committed to paying what ever it takes to win, in comparison the Kroenke’s 8.2 Billion fortune does not factor into the Nuggets expenditure as they run the team like a regular business and will be very unlikely to pay the luxury tax.
I believe in previous iterations of the league, a smart reasonably wealthy owner could win multiple titles (Peter Holt) but now with luxury tax rules the way they are and the plethora of billionaire owners, my thinking is Celtics owners need better revenue streams like the Knicks & Lakers have with their arenas.