Author Topic: Sully is no longer a celtics  (Read 15657 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #105 on: July 10, 2016, 07:55:18 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
I for one am sad to see Sully go.

He is a really talented ball player, arguably as talented as anyone from a natural skills standpoint.  That we got a player who legitimately is a double-double threat every night (as one of the better rebounders in the league) at the 21st pick was quite a steal.


Once Danny saw the deals that went out for players who have accomplished much less and are less talented than Sully, I am sure he knew it was over.  He should get over $10M a year given his production.  I am wondering if this health/fitness is delaying his signing.

It is the right move to let him move on.  We signed Horford, drafted 3 guys who can play PF, and we still have Jerebko and Crowder.  There just isn't enough time for all these players, especially if we make a deal for Okafor.


Amen. Sad.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #106 on: July 10, 2016, 08:09:42 PM »

Offline SparzWizard

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18856
  • Tommy Points: 1119
I'm thinking the Warriors might go after him too lol. Or the Clippers/Lakers.


#FireJoe
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) 2022 - 2025
I am the Master of Panic.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #107 on: July 10, 2016, 08:10:16 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8736
  • Tommy Points: 855
We will miss his rebounding.

In the Cavs series last year he was one of our best players and the first half of this year he might have been our 2nd or 3rd best 2-way guy. Hope hes successful.

Felt him and Turner were really keys to our success this year.

Long term letting them go was the right decision. Horford is a superior player to Sully and with Turner Brown Rozier and Smart have far higher ceilings.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #108 on: July 10, 2016, 08:11:17 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8736
  • Tommy Points: 855
I'm thinking the Warriors might go after him too lol. Or the Clippers/Lakers.
hope Brooklyn doesnt get him honestly.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #109 on: July 10, 2016, 08:20:38 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
I'm thinking the Warriors might go after him too lol. Or the Clippers/Lakers.
hope Brooklyn doesnt get him honestly.



Brooklyn really does seem inevitable. Warriors and Clippers can only offer the vet's min (not sure about the Lakers' cap situation). It doesn't make sense for him to take the vet's min when he's only coming off of his rookie deal, the NBPA would go nuts. And quite frankly, I don't see Sully caring about winning that much to sacrifice financially.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #110 on: July 10, 2016, 08:22:19 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
I don't care how you slice it but we just let  #21 and #2 draft picks go for nothing in return. Are we really this good of a team?

I do not believe we have replaced Turner yet. it is true that we may have his replacement on board already, but that still means someone has to step up to fill the gap that his departure has created. Now we let Sully, our best rebounder, go for nothing in return.

What is the plan for the future?

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #111 on: July 10, 2016, 08:27:55 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25582
  • Tommy Points: 2722
I don't care how you slice it but we just let  #21 and #2 draft picks go for nothing in return. Are we really this good of a team?

I do not believe we have replaced Turner yet. it is true that we may have his replacement on board already, but that still means someone has to step up to fill the gap that his departure has created. Now we let Sully, our best rebounder, go for nothing in return.

What is the plan for the future?

The fact that ET was at one time a #2 pick for Philly in 2010 is irrelevant.  C's didn't spend a #2 to get him.    We did, of course, spend the 21 to get Sully.  But that's NBA life for 21st picks -- those still playing after 4 years that is.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #112 on: July 10, 2016, 08:31:04 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
Can a mod cut the s of the end of this thread? It annoys me to know end browsing the forums lol.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #113 on: July 10, 2016, 08:32:33 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8736
  • Tommy Points: 855
Can a mod cut the s of the end of this thread? It annoys me to know end browsing the forums lol.
*no

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #114 on: July 10, 2016, 08:39:41 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7377
  • Tommy Points: 570
I don't care how you slice it but we just let  #21 and #2 draft picks go for nothing in return. Are we really this good of a team?

I do not believe we have replaced Turner yet. it is true that we may have his replacement on board already, but that still means someone has to step up to fill the gap that his departure has created. Now we let Sully, our best rebounder, go for nothing in return.

What is the plan for the future?
There has to be another shoe to drop.  But if you watched the playoffs the past two seasons it should be no surprise why they renounced Sully.   He made Ainge's decision a farily easy one - even though for the time being there are major holes on the team.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #115 on: July 10, 2016, 08:51:22 PM »

Offline GratefulCs

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3181
  • Tommy Points: 496
  • Salmon and Mashed Potatoes
Can a mod cut the s of the end of this thread? It annoys me to know end browsing the forums lol.
youse guys's
I trust Danny Ainge

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #116 on: July 10, 2016, 09:41:07 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20110
  • Tommy Points: 1332
Quote
Anyone out there think if Sully gets his act together he'll be as good as Horford in 2 or 3 years?

He's what 23 now?  I guess there is a chance he could smarten up like Zach Randolph.

I'm just scared he figures it out with another team and we're left here wondering what could have been.
I have little doubt he'll perform well with another team.  I suspect he'll be a 14/8 player for someone and have a solid pro career

If we were allowed to bet, I would take this bet and bet against you.

Re: Sully is no longer a celtics
« Reply #117 on: July 10, 2016, 10:52:12 PM »

Offline flybono

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Tommy Points: 49
You would think Ainge just let go the second coming of Barkley.

JSully, He gone