Author Topic: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back  (Read 6036 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #15 on: July 02, 2012, 06:45:17 PM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9348
  • Tommy Points: 3072
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
If the C's can sign him without using their MLE, I would love to see him come back.  
Yea not for the MLE isn't that what we gave his last year?
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2012, 06:45:59 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
If the C's can sign him without using their MLE, I would love to see him come back.  
Yea not for the MLE isn't that what we gave his last year?
We signed him to the taxpayer mini-MLE of 3 million for a one year deal.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #17 on: July 02, 2012, 10:27:23 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15294
  • Tommy Points: 1038
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
If the C's can sign him without using their MLE, I would love to see him come back.  
Yea not for the MLE isn't that what we gave his last year?
We signed him to the taxpayer mini-MLE of 3 million for a one year deal.
That's what I would offer him again.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2012, 10:32:26 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
If the C's can sign him without using their MLE, I would love to see him come back.  
Yea not for the MLE isn't that what we gave his last year?
We signed him to the taxpayer mini-MLE of 3 million for a one year deal.
That's what I would offer him again.
That'd eat up half our MLE. We might need that for Steamer or other higher level FAs.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2012, 10:45:32 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15294
  • Tommy Points: 1038
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
If the C's can sign him without using their MLE, I would love to see him come back.  
Yea not for the MLE isn't that what we gave his last year?
We signed him to the taxpayer mini-MLE of 3 million for a one year deal.
That's what I would offer him again.
That'd eat up half our MLE. We might need that for Steamer or other higher level FAs.
Hopefully Steamer takes the QO which I don't think impacts their ability to offer the MLE.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2012, 10:55:28 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53445
  • Tommy Points: 2578
Don't the Celtics own Wilcox's non-bird rights since he was on the team last season?

So they can pay up to the $3million (+20%?) he earned last season?

There should be no need to dip into the MLE to re-sign Wilcox.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2012, 10:56:52 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Don't the Celtics own Wilcox's non-bird rights since he was on the team last season?

So they can pay up to the $3million (+20%?) he earned last season?

There should be no need to dip into the MLE to re-sign Wilcox.
No we waived him to get a roster spot, for Hollons I think.

Re: C's Considering signing Chris Wlicox, Wilcox wants to come back
« Reply #22 on: July 02, 2012, 11:01:10 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53445
  • Tommy Points: 2578
Don't the Celtics own Wilcox's non-bird rights since he was on the team last season?

So they can pay up to the $3million (+20%?) he earned last season?

There should be no need to dip into the MLE to re-sign Wilcox.
No we waived him to get a roster spot, for Hollons I think.
Ah okay, I understand now. Thank you.