Perhaps Doc does more than just coach this team for three hours 3-4 times a week? perhaps he has seen countless hours of video on Hollins and analyzed it for Danny before Danny signed Hollins? Perhaps Doc after watching all that tape and seeing him in game action, decided he is world's better than Johnson at this point in time and a has a better chance to succeed? Perhaps Doc trusts KG and Pierce who said they have played with Hollins in the off season and trust his ability to perform? perhaps Doc knows that the other players on the team don't trust Johnson to perform cohesively and consistently with them? Perhaps Johnson sucks and your uninformed opinion(as compared to that of Doc Rivers, head coach of the Boston Celtics) is dead wrong?
So, you don't have any actual argument other than Doc being perfect and incapable of error? Does he also change water into wine for the post-game win celebrations?
All you have is "perhaps". What I have are facts. Like the fact Hollins has been a bench scrub his entire career. Like the fact that Hollins can't possibly have the slightest idea how the Celtic offense works or how the defense functions. Like the fact that we did get to see JJJ play earlier in the year and, while certainly not great, he didn't suck so bad that Doc should be terrified of putting him on the court.
Oh, and pretty much every excuse you're offering up for not playing JJJ were exactly the same reasons given when Stiemsma couldn't get on the court.
Mike
Actually I was trying to make it simple for you since when I have presented facts such as Doc plays rookies(the minutes Doc has played rookies in the past) you have counter argued that Doc only plays rookies when someone gets hurt. Then when I have shown facts that this counter argument is wrong(such as when Doc has given minutes to rookies and young players simply because they earned it and not when they are replacing an injured player) you have pooh poohed that and gone back to your ridiculous assumption that Doc has some irrational hate of young players.
Here are facts:
Mike Miller won a Rookie of the Year award while being coached by Doc.
Celtic second and first round players that have talent have consistently gotten playing time once they have shown they are good enough to earn time on the court.
Doc has consistently given players that have been in the league and been traded to or signed by the Celtics mid season playing time to assess whether they fit in and can handle the system and Celtics' way of doing things right away. If they can handle it and perform, they get playing time, if they can't, they stop getting playing time. Really simple. There are a ton of examples of this.
Your hatred towards Doc shines through and is quite overwhelming. Doc isn't perfect. His rotations at times suck. His overplaying of minutes of some players and need to win every game is, at times, quite bad. His reluctance to give in when its obvious his team is going to lose is really hoorid at times.
But the one thing he is really good at, the proper pace of developing and judging young talent and bringing them along accordingly, is the one thing you continually perpetuate as being some characteristically flawed hatred in Doc for young players. It is wrong and ridiculously absurd given the amount of proof to the contrary.
BASICALLY, NO PLAYER HAS EVER BEEN PASSED OVER BY DOC AND THEN GONE ON TO BE A GREAT PLAYER ELSEWHERE BECAUSE DOC JUDGED THEIR TALENT CORRECTLY AND DIDN'T PLAY AND DEVELOP THEM.
Is this even disputable? Is there even one player that is an example that refutes this fact that you and many others have consistently developed as an urban myth on this website?
I don't think Doc walks on water or is beyond question in his decision making. But in this one particular area, I think you and the others that follow your lead are completely and utterly wrong and, quite honestly, just attempting to push through an agenda because 5 years ago you hated Doc and want to prove he isn't a good coach in an attempt to prove your unwarranted hatred to be valid. Doc proved 5 years ago to be an exceptional coach and proved you wrong and 5 years later you're still trying to prove your opinion to be correct when all proof shows you to be pathetically incorrect.
That's pretty sad.