if we can get a first rounder from LA, I am now on board with a Rondo for Gasol swap.
I wrote a super long post that didn't get much of a response explaining my reasons against the trade here:
http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=53233.msg1136419#msg1136419However, I am beginning to be concerned that as every day goes by, the more and more Rondo's trade value declines. Since we are accepting the fact that Rondo is almost assuredly going to be dealt - are we going to do better than Pau Gasol? I know this move would help LA I think, and we know it isn't worth doing that. Every year the Lakers don't win the title is like the Celtics winning half a championship. We don't want them passing us in titles. Rondo will work really well with Bynum, and that gives LA Rondo and Bynum to build around for a lot. And with Rondo's cheap salary, once Kobe is off the books - they will get another guy to come there EASILY. So, that's not good. But still, Pau Gasol, I've always been a fan. And I just don't see us doing anywhere near him for Rondo. I realy don't. So many teams in the league have PGs. The Lakers have a GLARING hole, and they have Pau playing out of position (he's more of a center now.) Unless the Jazz will somehow offer us Millsap for Rondo (and maybe a first, and hell, even throw in JJJ), then this is the deal, imo.
I say the first is the dealbreaker because we should maybe facilitate a three way. We send them Rondo and JO('s expiring deal), they send us Gasol, and then they send one of their first rounders and part of their TE to Cleveland for Sessions. Cleveland sends us Sessions. Anyone like?