« Reply #79 on: March 23, 2011, 08:59:59 PM »
They said the same thing about Chris Paul a couple years ago. Lets see some sustained greatness before we do too many of these proclamations.
CP3's season in 2007-2008 was much better than Rose's this year. He really should have won the MVP, Kobe got his as a career achievement.
Ohh myy Godd, I was saying the same thing. Chris Paul is head over heels better than Rose. Chris Paul so good that year it was scary. One of the best point guard performances (regular season and playoffs) that I ever seen. Kobe got that award as a career achievement award for a just a reasonable year for him
Paul's best season was 08-09 and I don't think it is that close really. I mean he was better in virtually every metric (he had fewer APG, but actually had a better AST%).
Having a better or worse assist ration does not indicate whether he is a better or worse passer...it only indicated how often his possessions end in a credited assist, as opposed to scoring or turning the ball over. A guy can score, still get 8 or 9 assists, and have 2 turnovers a game, and still have a middling assist ratio.
Turnover ratio to me is a more valuable statistic.
I understand the metric, but the reality is, Chris Paul scored 1.7 more points a game on the exact same FGA in 08-09. He grabbed 1.5 more boards a game. His assists went down slightly (chandler and peja missing a ton of time contributed to that greatly) and he turned the ball over a bit more, but his overall increased scoring efficiency, total points, and total boards, more then makes up for the slight up tick in turnovers. Chris Paul was a better player in 08-09 then he was in 07-08 and I don't think it is close.

Logged
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick
Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner