Birdwatcher, I do agree about Iguodala being asked to do too much and I do think he would help the Celtics, but I think you are not going to get Iguodala at his best if you are going to play him next to Pierce. I’d love to say the money doesn’t matter, and if he was just over paid it wouldn’t be that big of a deal, but he’s a max player. His best defense is against other teams 3s. His best offense is mid-range to the bucket stuff. I think in the half-court he would hurt more than help, though Iggy and Rondo on the break would be fantastic.
If we were talking about replacing Pierce with Iggy here that would be one thing, he’d still be overpaid, but you would potentially be able to get the most bang for the buck, but replacing Ray with Iguodala is asking for a lower return on the investment. Why pay max money for a guy that doesn’t really fit, when you could find better or equally good fits for the much less?
I don’t want to see Pierce go anywhere. He should be a Celtic until he retires, so to me, Iguodala seems a bit redundant.
I just always get these visions of Scottie Pippen on the Rockets. Scottie was still a great player, but put into a situation where he didn’t fit. In that case he wasn’t asked to play out of position, but he pretty much was asked to be a spot up shooter, which was not his game. While Scottie still had some great games it was a disappointment. I think we’d be looking at something similar with Iguodala playing next to Pierce.