Author Topic: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)  (Read 26978 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #105 on: July 30, 2009, 05:51:13 PM »

Offline Celticsman

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 19
  • Tommy Points: 1
  • Celtics Pride
trading Ray Allen? no...  :(
Celtics Pride from Rome, Italy

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #106 on: August 02, 2009, 07:06:20 PM »

Offline trey_h

  • Torrey Craig
  • Posts: 9
  • Tommy Points: 4
no no no. we couldn't get equal value for what he does for this team. if you want banner #18, don't trade Ray Allen.

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #107 on: August 02, 2009, 08:19:18 PM »

Offline TradeProposalDude

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 536
  • Tommy Points: 56
The source of all the Ray Allen trade ideas is posters' discontent with the way Ray played in the early part of the playoffs. His production during his first season here was also less than desirable. I think people need to realize that his poor play was often a result of being an odd man out of the offense. Only towards the latter part of last years playoffs did his role start to blend in with the program. He wasn't taking off balance three's all the time and working SOLELY off picks. In the Finals series, he was actually catching and shooting with ease and having no trouble creating his offense. You know, like the Ray Allen we've seen throughout his career, the Ray Allen who will be in the Hall of Fame one day.

As for trading him today, it would not make any sense. He is still franchise player caliber. With an expiring contract on top of that, he has value you just can't take for granted. I understand Celtics fans' concern with how our immediate future following the KG/Allen/Pierce era may bring us back to days of despair and agony. Yet we've come this far, and winning a title should be the first thing on our minds. Trading Ray would totally contradict the motive our organization has set out to accomplish this goal, even if "longer term" value is secured (supposedly).

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #108 on: August 03, 2009, 08:23:54 PM »

Offline Celticsman

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 19
  • Tommy Points: 1
  • Celtics Pride
Celtics Pride from Rome, Italy

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #109 on: August 09, 2009, 02:21:36 PM »

Offline vjcsmoke

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3219
  • Tommy Points: 183
Neither Odom nor Prince are better players than Ray Allen for us at SG.  I haven't seen any realistic trade scenarios involving Ray Allen that improve the Celtics chance of winning THIS YEAR, so I'm gonna pronounce this talk DEAD for now.

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #110 on: August 09, 2009, 02:39:35 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16176
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Is this a 2k9 thread?

Re: Trading Ray Allen debate (merged)
« Reply #111 on: August 09, 2009, 02:39:49 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I pulled the pin because I think this talk is now dead.  (for now)