Author Topic: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?  (Read 2061 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« on: July 07, 2009, 09:19:13 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
Other than Sheed and House, our bench pretty much sucks.
We've got Scal, TA, Pruitt, Walker, and Giddens all expiring.  Their contracts total about 8 million dollars.  We could easily get a good back-up PG for that (or a decent PG and PF).  We can still use the LLE on a SF.  And we should still match whatever BBD gets offered.  That gives us 11 players so DA can still sign all the losers he wants to make up for the losers we traded (and resign Powe).
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2009, 09:23:06 PM »

Offline jv2764

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 394
  • Tommy Points: 27
Other than Sheed and House, our bench pretty much sucks.
We've got Scal, TA, Pruitt, Walker, and Giddens all expiring.  Their contracts total about 8 million dollars.  We could easily get a good back-up PG for that (or a decent PG and PF).  We can still use the LLE on a SF.  And we should still match whatever BBD gets offered.  That gives us 11 players so DA can still sign all the losers he wants to make up for the losers we traded (and resign Powe).
Problem is who would want any of those 4 guys though.

Re: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2009, 09:48:30 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Other than Sheed and House, our bench pretty much sucks.
We've got Scal, TA, Pruitt, Walker, and Giddens all expiring.  Their contracts total about 8 million dollars.  We could easily get a good back-up PG for that (or a decent PG and PF).  We can still use the LLE on a SF.  And we should still match whatever BBD gets offered.  That gives us 11 players so DA can still sign all the losers he wants to make up for the losers we traded (and resign Powe).
Teams trying to shed salary, and get expiring contracts for the free agent bonanza next year.
Problem is who would want any of those 4 guys though.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2009, 09:53:44 PM »

Offline Champzilla

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 577
  • Tommy Points: 102
Rasheed Wallace and Eddie House on the bench is a pretty good bench, also, we have the best starting 5 in the NBA.  We are still probably going to add one or two more players (BBD and hill would be great)
Boston is the Greatest City in the World !!!

Re: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2009, 10:14:02 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Rasheed Wallace and Eddie House on the bench is a pretty good bench, also, we have the best starting 5 in the NBA.  We are still probably going to add one or two more players (BBD and hill would be great)
But why not trade these assets while they have value instead of letting them expire at the end of the season in which they have no value.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2009, 09:55:59 AM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15245
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Other than Sheed and House, our bench pretty much sucks.
We've got Scal, TA, Pruitt, Walker, and Giddens all expiring.  Their contracts total about 8 million dollars.  We could easily get a good back-up PG for that (or a decent PG and PF).  We can still use the LLE on a SF.  And we should still match whatever BBD gets offered.  That gives us 11 players so DA can still sign all the losers he wants to make up for the losers we traded (and resign Powe).
Teams trying to shed salary, and get expiring contracts for the free agent bonanza next year.
Problem is who would want any of those 4 guys though.
The Celtics.  They are offically paying 8 million in luxury tax now.  These guys have value to round out the bench and come off the books next year.  Meanwhile Walker and Giddens are the best (and really only) prospects for the long term (post Big Three).

A trade might be coming but only to reduce the roster to 15 while keeping some young talent with upside.  IMO, that means Tony Allen and possibly Scal are gone.

Re: Honestly, why wouldn't we make a trade?
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2009, 10:03:23 AM »

Offline Actionjakson

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 313
  • Tommy Points: 25
Other than Sheed and House, our bench pretty much sucks.
We've got Scal, TA, Pruitt, Walker, and Giddens all expiring.  Their contracts total about 8 million dollars.  We could easily get a good back-up PG for that (or a decent PG and PF).  We can still use the LLE on a SF.  And we should still match whatever BBD gets offered.  That gives us 11 players so DA can still sign all the losers he wants to make up for the losers we traded (and resign Powe).


At the moment, TA and scal have little to no trade value. At the trading deadline, maybe they can get us something, but right now there is nothing.
“We don't see ourselves as four All-Stars. We see ourselves as one unit. It's like five fingers on a hand. You can do more damage together as a fist than spread out flat.”
- Rasheed Wallace