« Reply #47 on: November 22, 2019, 08:39:40 AM »
He is playing much better against the Bucks tonight. With about 6 minutes left he has played 22 minutes, shooting 5 of 11 overall and 3 of 4 from 3 for 15 points and has added 5 rebounds and 4 assists.
He passes the eye test if you look at the stat sheet, not if you look at the game.
This was back-to-back-to-back plays tonight.
Pass it to the wing, cut toward the ball, get in the way of his teammate, stall the offense.
Fail to get back all the way on defense, his man back cut him but missed the dunk
Pass to the wing, stood at the top of the key when the player overthrew the ball, watched as Bledsoe easily went in for a layup.
The fact of the matter is that the Blazers were in this game until they put Melo back in.
He was -1 in 29 minutes, they lost by 8, so they were -7 in the 19 minutes he was on the bench. In other words, overall they were better when he was in the game then when he was on the bench a couple plays here or there not with standing.
Did you watch the game? If not it seems really strange to argue with a guy that did. I also think everyone knows plus minus for a single game is not really meaningful. Gary Trent jr has the best plus minuses for Portland. Illasova was +11, much better than Giannis +5 (despite Giannis having a triple double through 3). Can we vote to ban single game plus minus on this forum?
He had a pretty solid shooting night, was fairly active on the boards and racked up a decent amount of assists. The argument was he was a net negative, despite the nice stats, and that the Blazers were in the game until Anthony was reinserted. That is just a strange argument given the Blazers were better with Anthony in the game then when he was on the bench in that game.

Logged
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick
Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip