0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 01:54:32 PMQuote from: Eddie20 on October 23, 2017, 01:39:09 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 01:34:05 PMQuote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.again, just humorous the percentage of your trade ideas that help the Celtics main conference rival. Fortunately the cavs have made their backcourt bed with rose, smith, IT and wade and would have an all out mutiny if they added another starting level point guardCleveland is an obvious destination for Bledsoe. Milwaukee makes sense as well. Not too many other teams do though given what Bledsoe makes (i.e. Boston just doesn't have the salary to make a realistic offer).Please explain to me the rotation of Rose, IT, Wade, Smith and Bledsoe. Wade and Smith have both made public statements already about having difficulty with their new roles and IT is not playing. We are talking about real life, not a fan duel lineup
Quote from: Eddie20 on October 23, 2017, 01:39:09 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 01:34:05 PMQuote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.again, just humorous the percentage of your trade ideas that help the Celtics main conference rival. Fortunately the cavs have made their backcourt bed with rose, smith, IT and wade and would have an all out mutiny if they added another starting level point guardCleveland is an obvious destination for Bledsoe. Milwaukee makes sense as well. Not too many other teams do though given what Bledsoe makes (i.e. Boston just doesn't have the salary to make a realistic offer).
Quote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 01:34:05 PMQuote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.again, just humorous the percentage of your trade ideas that help the Celtics main conference rival. Fortunately the cavs have made their backcourt bed with rose, smith, IT and wade and would have an all out mutiny if they added another starting level point guard
Quote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.
Quote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.
Bledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.
Also let's not forget earlier this wake you were proposing ways Cleveland could get Conley and gasol. Got any ideas for the Celtics making trades to improve given this is a Celtic Forum?
Quote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:11:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 01:54:32 PMQuote from: Eddie20 on October 23, 2017, 01:39:09 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 01:34:05 PMQuote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.again, just humorous the percentage of your trade ideas that help the Celtics main conference rival. Fortunately the cavs have made their backcourt bed with rose, smith, IT and wade and would have an all out mutiny if they added another starting level point guardCleveland is an obvious destination for Bledsoe. Milwaukee makes sense as well. Not too many other teams do though given what Bledsoe makes (i.e. Boston just doesn't have the salary to make a realistic offer).Please explain to me the rotation of Rose, IT, Wade, Smith and Bledsoe. Wade and Smith have both made public statements already about having difficulty with their new roles and IT is not playing. We are talking about real life, not a fan duel lineupRose is already out a week. Smith is back in the starting lineup with Wade coming of the bench. Thomas is out for months. And I'm not sure why you included Smith, I had him in the trade with Phoenix. Perhaps you should actually read before you go spouting off at the mouth.
Quote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:17:01 PMAlso let's not forget earlier this wake you were proposing ways Cleveland could get Conley and gasol. Got any ideas for the Celtics making trades to improve given this is a Celtic Forum?Um, that wasn't me. But nice try.
Quote from: slightly biased bias fan on October 18, 2017, 04:35:51 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 18, 2017, 12:15:39 PMI don't see why the Cavs would need to trade both Thompson and Love in that deal. Nor why someone like Rose would need to be included (he does nothing for Memphis so why would they want him). Because they need to make the salaries work and both players have become redundant for Cleveland, that’s why they’ve tried so many line up changes as Thompson and Love can’t start together anymore, I’d include Rose too because not only is he finished but he’s going to be a locker room problem if he’s no longer playing, Memphis will get short term point guard cover and Rose comes off the books next season.they don't need both of their salaries included to match and they absolutely need one of them to play with Gasol
Quote from: Moranis on October 18, 2017, 12:15:39 PMI don't see why the Cavs would need to trade both Thompson and Love in that deal. Nor why someone like Rose would need to be included (he does nothing for Memphis so why would they want him). Because they need to make the salaries work and both players have become redundant for Cleveland, that’s why they’ve tried so many line up changes as Thompson and Love can’t start together anymore, I’d include Rose too because not only is he finished but he’s going to be a locker room problem if he’s no longer playing, Memphis will get short term point guard cover and Rose comes off the books next season.
I don't see why the Cavs would need to trade both Thompson and Love in that deal. Nor why someone like Rose would need to be included (he does nothing for Memphis so why would they want him).
Quote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:15:13 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:11:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 01:54:32 PMQuote from: Eddie20 on October 23, 2017, 01:39:09 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 01:34:05 PMQuote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.again, just humorous the percentage of your trade ideas that help the Celtics main conference rival. Fortunately the cavs have made their backcourt bed with rose, smith, IT and wade and would have an all out mutiny if they added another starting level point guardCleveland is an obvious destination for Bledsoe. Milwaukee makes sense as well. Not too many other teams do though given what Bledsoe makes (i.e. Boston just doesn't have the salary to make a realistic offer).Please explain to me the rotation of Rose, IT, Wade, Smith and Bledsoe. Wade and Smith have both made public statements already about having difficulty with their new roles and IT is not playing. We are talking about real life, not a fan duel lineupRose is already out a week. Smith is back in the starting lineup with Wade coming of the bench. Thomas is out for months. And I'm not sure why you included Smith, I had him in the trade with Phoenix. Perhaps you should actually read before you go spouting off at the mouth.Wait so you have the suns giving up the best player in the deal and taking back a bad contract like smith? Then they throw in young talent like warren and chriss? Truly bizarre
Quote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:18:12 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:17:01 PMAlso let's not forget earlier this wake you were proposing ways Cleveland could get Conley and gasol. Got any ideas for the Celtics making trades to improve given this is a Celtic Forum?Um, that wasn't me. But nice try. This isnlt you talking about how they could get Gasol and keep love (and also rose) Quote from: Moranis on October 22, 2017, 11:23:55 AMQuote from: slightly biased bias fan on October 18, 2017, 04:35:51 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 18, 2017, 12:15:39 PMI don't see why the Cavs would need to trade both Thompson and Love in that deal. Nor why someone like Rose would need to be included (he does nothing for Memphis so why would they want him). Because they need to make the salaries work and both players have become redundant for Cleveland, that’s why they’ve tried so many line up changes as Thompson and Love can’t start together anymore, I’d include Rose too because not only is he finished but he’s going to be a locker room problem if he’s no longer playing, Memphis will get short term point guard cover and Rose comes off the books next season.they don't need both of their salaries included to match and they absolutely need one of them to play with Gasol
Quote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:24:30 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:15:13 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:11:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 01:54:32 PMQuote from: Eddie20 on October 23, 2017, 01:39:09 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 01:34:05 PMQuote from: seancally on October 23, 2017, 01:26:32 PMQuote from: jay on October 23, 2017, 12:57:58 PMBledsoe for Faried?Phoenix still has Brandon Knight under contract for 2 years after he gets back from injury. Mike James and Tyler Ullis at PG this year isn't great. They have really young guys at PF so Manimal could help make them tougher. Denver has Millsap and Lyles at PF and also Darrell Arthur. They could really use a veteran pg like Bledsoe and move Jamal Murray to backup PG/SG.I'm sure Denver would be willing to jump on Bledsoe. They're thin at the PG but a piece like Bledsoe would definitely bump them into solid playoff team out west.On the other hand, hey, maybe Cleveland offers a trade centered around IT I'm not sure if Bledsoe is going to warrant a whole heck of a lot. Guys requested trade in-season have tended not to yield big-time offers. I don't think Cleveland would give up their BKN pick for Bledsoe, regardless of the Lebron factor, because honestly they're probably thinking, Lebron is going to do whatever he wants anyways. So why bother shooting ourselves in the foot long-term.Bledsoe, Warren, Chriss/Bender, PHO 2nd for Shumpert, Frye, Smith, BKNseems like a reasonable enough trade for both teams.again, just humorous the percentage of your trade ideas that help the Celtics main conference rival. Fortunately the cavs have made their backcourt bed with rose, smith, IT and wade and would have an all out mutiny if they added another starting level point guardCleveland is an obvious destination for Bledsoe. Milwaukee makes sense as well. Not too many other teams do though given what Bledsoe makes (i.e. Boston just doesn't have the salary to make a realistic offer).Please explain to me the rotation of Rose, IT, Wade, Smith and Bledsoe. Wade and Smith have both made public statements already about having difficulty with their new roles and IT is not playing. We are talking about real life, not a fan duel lineupRose is already out a week. Smith is back in the starting lineup with Wade coming of the bench. Thomas is out for months. And I'm not sure why you included Smith, I had him in the trade with Phoenix. Perhaps you should actually read before you go spouting off at the mouth.Wait so you have the suns giving up the best player in the deal and taking back a bad contract like smith? Then they throw in young talent like warren and chriss? Truly bizarreso you have now basically admitted you didn't read my post and were just trolling. Good to know.The Suns do the trade to acquire the Brooklyn pick. That should seem pretty obvious. That is by far the best asset in the trade. Bledsoe may very well be the best player in the trade, but he has demanded a trade and was sent home from practice and will not play tonight. The Suns have lost whatever leverage they may have had with him. His value just isn't very high.
Just curious though Moranis...Do you live in Cleveland? I mean, dude seriously lol. What is your affiliations/allegiations with them, if you don't mind me asking?
Quote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:29:03 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:18:12 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:17:01 PMAlso let's not forget earlier this wake you were proposing ways Cleveland could get Conley and gasol. Got any ideas for the Celtics making trades to improve given this is a Celtic Forum?Um, that wasn't me. But nice try. This isnlt you talking about how they could get Gasol and keep love (and also rose) Quote from: Moranis on October 22, 2017, 11:23:55 AMQuote from: slightly biased bias fan on October 18, 2017, 04:35:51 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 18, 2017, 12:15:39 PMI don't see why the Cavs would need to trade both Thompson and Love in that deal. Nor why someone like Rose would need to be included (he does nothing for Memphis so why would they want him). Because they need to make the salaries work and both players have become redundant for Cleveland, that’s why they’ve tried so many line up changes as Thompson and Love can’t start together anymore, I’d include Rose too because not only is he finished but he’s going to be a locker room problem if he’s no longer playing, Memphis will get short term point guard cover and Rose comes off the books next season.they don't need both of their salaries included to match and they absolutely need one of them to play with GasolI posted in a thread that many others posted in and that I didn't start it and it was about the Cavs and Grizzlies.
Quote from: Monkhouse on October 23, 2017, 02:39:21 PMJust curious though Moranis...Do you live in Cleveland? I mean, dude seriously lol. What is your affiliations/allegiations with them, if you don't mind me asking?Not sure He has never officially answered this
Quote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:47:18 PMQuote from: Monkhouse on October 23, 2017, 02:39:21 PMJust curious though Moranis...Do you live in Cleveland? I mean, dude seriously lol. What is your affiliations/allegiations with them, if you don't mind me asking?Not sure He has never officially answered this Not really opposed to his views or beliefs, just curious tbh. Maybe there could be an story behind that I would like to know myself, only if Moranis would like to reveal that. I never really had a problem with LaBrd, but eventually I got tired of him talking about Embiid or some binkie on the 76ers in every thread. Just curiousity killed the cat type of thing.
Quote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:29:03 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 23, 2017, 02:18:12 PMQuote from: celticsclay on October 23, 2017, 02:17:01 PMAlso let's not forget earlier this wake you were proposing ways Cleveland could get Conley and gasol. Got any ideas for the Celtics making trades to improve given this is a Celtic Forum?Um, that wasn't me. But nice try. This isnlt you talking about how they could get Gasol and keep love (and also rose) Quote from: Moranis on October 22, 2017, 11:23:55 AMQuote from: slightly biased bias fan on October 18, 2017, 04:35:51 PMQuote from: Moranis on October 18, 2017, 12:15:39 PMI don't see why the Cavs would need to trade both Thompson and Love in that deal. Nor why someone like Rose would need to be included (he does nothing for Memphis so why would they want him). Because they need to make the salaries work and both players have become redundant for Cleveland, that’s why they’ve tried so many line up changes as Thompson and Love can’t start together anymore, I’d include Rose too because not only is he finished but he’s going to be a locker room problem if he’s no longer playing, Memphis will get short term point guard cover and Rose comes off the books next season.they don't need both of their salaries included to match and they absolutely need one of them to play with GasolI posted in a thread that many others posted in and that I didn't start it and it was about the Cavs and Grizzlies. You don't think it is bizarre to constantly make posts about trades that help our main rival? Your other recent posts were stating ways Boston could tank this season (if Irving gets hurt). Obviously fans of other teams are great to have here. My issue is with being dishonest about it. If you really are just a straight Cavs fan I will appreciate the discourse with you a lot more