Critics—and there were many—called it an overpay made all the more puzzling by Ainge’s reticence to include that Nets pick in potential deals for Paul George and Jimmy Butler, both of whom are significantly better than Irving.
Both of whom are significantly better than Irving?? George is also a massive flight risk, as shown by the price he went for. Butler has got to be one of the most overrated stars in the league based on recent commentary, since when has he become even as good as a Ray Allen in his prime?
I would have been fuming if Ainge has used the Nets pick on either of those guys, as would most of the board I expect? People weren't willing to trade Brown for Butler either.
What we have achieved in this trade, and it's really being ignored, is get a star player who is much closer in age to our Nets' picks and also already a proven winner. This to go along with another one in Hayward just a year older.
You can argue about us being less competitive this year but if Isaiah struggles with injury then that's hard to prove anyway. In years 2-5 we should be much better and younger and cheaper. The Nets pick is the unknown here but even if that falls top 3 the player wasn't helping advance our window until year 3 onwards from now. And a likely consequence would've been losing Smart, taking a further step back.
In the balance of things, this trade has improved us and enabled us to make the future moves that keep us at least at this level of competitiveness, something we couldn't have done had we kept IT.