I will lead this by saying that I am in favor of the Kyrie trade despite having a strong attachment to IT's career. The "little guy's" confidence, character, and resiliency made me proud to be a Celtics fan. Part of me wanted to see him in a Celtics uniform for the rest of his career. His genuine appreciation for Boston was great to hear about from a fan perspective. Avery Bradley is another guy that I wanted to stick around. I hate to see them gone but the upside of Kyrie in Brad's system is exciting to think about.
Anyways, I am curious as to how important the likability of the Celtics(or other sports teams) is to everyone? I don't necessarily mean likability outside of commitment to basketball and playing the right way. Jeff Green was a nice guy that I couldn't invest in because he wasn't driven to be the best. Personally I can't enjoy or invest the same emotion in players or teams that don't have some sort of character, grit or toughness. There needs to be a redeeming quality that goes beyond pure talent. That's not to say that there can't be occasional drama or issues.
Some of the recent Red Sox teams are a perfect example of what can turn me away from my local teams. The 2004 Lakers are another example of a team that lacked substance beyond their talent (it's also why they didn't beat the Pistons).
Fortunately, the culture and character of this team starts with Brad Stevens. We are extremely fortunate to have him as a coach and I have no concerns that this new group will be great for a long time. As much as I became invested in the gritty overachievers we needed to upgrade the overall talent on our team.