Author Topic: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.  (Read 5806 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« on: June 30, 2017, 12:35:30 PM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
I feel Hayward is enough, we don't need Paul George.

We get Hayward and we get to keep Bradley, Crowder, KO. We can go for a lower tier scorer like Gallinari, Milsap, etc.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2017, 12:40:20 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8784
  • Tommy Points: 856
Do some googling on the salary cap.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2017, 12:42:26 PM »

Online A Future of Stevens

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2876
  • Tommy Points: 531
Do some googling on the salary cap.

I just don't get the lack of understanding of what a salary cap is.

I mean this could work, if we could create 50-60 mil in cap space.
#JKJB

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2017, 12:45:17 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7027
  • Tommy Points: 468
Hayward is enough for what?  To get a little better but not nearly good enough?  Ainge is going for it.  And I am cool with it.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2017, 12:59:48 PM »

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
Do some googling on the salary cap.

I just don't get the lack of understanding of what a salary cap is.

I mean this could work, if we could create 50-60 mil in cap space.

Pfft, like Danny dumping Horford for nothing isn't realistic.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2017, 02:04:01 PM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
Do some googling on the salary cap.
What does this have to do with the post?

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2017, 02:04:54 PM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
Hayward is enough for what?  To get a little better but not nearly good enough?  Ainge is going for it.  And I am cool with it.
Do you really think PG is going to put us over the hump with Lebron still in the conference?

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2017, 02:06:23 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8784
  • Tommy Points: 856
Do some googling on the salary cap.
What does this have to do with the post?
Your idea is entirely incompatible with the CBA. Other than that... not much.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2017, 02:14:10 PM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
I feel Hayward is enough, we don't need Paul George.

We get Hayward and we get to keep Bradley, Crowder, KO. We can go for a lower tier scorer like Gallinari, Milsap, etc.

In this scenario, do we still have Horford on our team? Or are you assuming Millsap is going to accept a contract on the level of Terry Rozier?
- LilRip

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2017, 02:16:00 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Do some googling on the salary cap.
What does this have to do with the post?
Your idea is entirely incompatible with the CBA. Other than that... not much.

Danny looks the CBA in it's face and laughs.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2017, 02:18:40 PM »

Online Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 38404
  • Tommy Points: 3458
  • On To Banner 19!
Hayward is enough for what?  To get a little better but not nearly good enough?  Ainge is going for it.  And I am cool with it.

No he's not.

He'll go after Hayward, and if not him, Griffin, and if not him, a 2nd tier FA + re-signing a few guys (or working on extensions for others, like some of our guards).

George + Hayward is not happening, and it seems like George is fully set on joining the Lakers.

"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2017, 02:24:17 PM »

Offline Sketch5

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3253
  • Tommy Points: 281
Hayward is enough for what?  To get a little better but not nearly good enough?  Ainge is going for it.  And I am cool with it.
Do you really think PG is going to put us over the hump with Lebron still in the conference?


Yes. Indy lost to the Cavs by a total of something like 16pts. With Hayward and PG13, you add a lot of scoring and better wing defense to Cover Lebron.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2017, 02:36:36 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Completely disagree.

Hayward is a nice addition if we can sign him as an FA. He is a huge piece that keeps us in contention in the East and I think he will get even better under BS and his system. He isn't the answer though and we still need another big fish.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2017, 02:47:39 PM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
Hayward puts us at a step below Cleveland and 3rd to fifth best in the NBA.  Adding George, in addition to Hayward, puts us a tiny bit ahead of Cleveland and gives us a puncher's chance against the Warriors.  Plus, we would still have young talent to grow in the future.  How we pay everyone come 2018 and beyond, I have no idea.

Re: Hayward is enough, we don't need George.
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2017, 03:02:09 PM »

Offline kraidstar

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6103
  • Tommy Points: 2570
Do some googling on the salary cap.
What does this have to do with the post?
Your idea is entirely incompatible with the CBA. Other than that... not much.

Couldn't we sign Hayward and then sign-and-trade for another FA player?