I'm not going to post links to every video, but just go to Youtube, type in, "Celtics Hayward and George", and you'll see a ton of stuff from The Herd (Cowherd), ESPN, The Jump, CBS Sports, First Take, etc. saying that the Celtics NEED to trade for George once they sign Hayward.
This, according to most of them, makes the C's favorites in the East, or at least gives them a great chance to dethrone Cleveland (even if there's no guarantees, they should take CLE to 6-7 games, and have a chance against Golden State).
Some of them are even raging at Ainge for not using "some" of his assets to facilitate his deals, and some had meltdowns LOL (like Nick Wright - but who honestly cares about him to be honest?)
Even Paul Pierce has said the C's should think about adding Hayward and George together and looking to start legitimately contending with a "superteam" in a sense. I wonder if PP34 is feeding some advice to Ainge though, because PP34 never seemed high on Fultz either and wanted the C's to trade the pick (which they did, for #3 and a future lottery pick, which also resulted in some extra cap space to possibly faclilitate these moves better).
But of course, they acknowledge that if the C's don't sign Hayward or Griffin (or trade for George, in that instance), then it's pretty much the same team going into next season.
So we will either see "Fireworks", "In Between" (sort of "Fireworks", but just one signing, then keep rolling), or "Nothing".
What do you think happens? Do you really want to see George+Hayward happen too?
MY GUESS: We sign one of Hayward/Griffin, and keep rolling. No George coming.