Author Topic: Chad Ford: C's now leaning towards Tatum over Jackson, Jackson declining workout  (Read 28646 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
https://mobile.twitter.com/JakeLFischer/status/877564484889477123

Brad liked Tatums ability to guard 1-4
Tatum may not be able to guard anyone very well, never mind 1's and 2's!

He has very underrated sneaky altheticism, and his wingspan helps make up in contesting shots. Then again how many SF's/PF's can you name that can guard 1's and 2's in the NBA..?
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
BJ Armstrong is the worst agent I have ever seen in the NBA. With that said, Jackson did chose his agent, so he takes part of the blame.

and if Jackson falls to 4 or even further (certainly possible), his agent should be fired

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

I doubt it. If anything, Tatum has always been a skilled passer offensively. Plus his length makes up for his weak altheticism.
Quote
Brad Stevens told Jayson Tatum he valued his ability to guard 1-4 while also packaging elite scoring ability.


Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

Not in the slightest.  He'a a very capable passer, and that might be an understatement.  His court vision is probably my favorite attribute.

I think Jackson's court vision is on a different level, which may be why Tatum seems inadequate in this regard.

Considering Jackson has literally one of the worst shooting forms, I have seen in a NBA prospect ever since MKG, I can only hope and pray that his passing makes up for his awful offense.

Have you seen Jackson pass or being sarcastic??

Draftexpress - Josh Jackson , point forward.

https://youtu.be/kaP4QCK1pZs

List sfs in the nba other than Lebron that can pass as well, pg guard like, like this..

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7680
  • Tommy Points: 447
https://mobile.twitter.com/JakeLFischer/status/877564484889477123

Brad liked Tatums ability to guard 1-4
Tatum may not be able to guard anyone very well, never mind 1's and 2's!

He has very underrated sneaky altheticism, and his wingspan helps make up in contesting shots. Then again how many SF's/PF's can you name that can guard 1's and 2's in the NBA..?
Not many, but I bet Jackson could.  I just find it strange that Stevens made that comment.

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10152
  • Tommy Points: 347
Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

I doubt it. If anything, Tatum has always been a skilled passer offensively. Plus his length makes up for his weak altheticism.
Quote
Brad Stevens told Jayson Tatum he valued his ability to guard 1-4 while also packaging elite scoring ability.


Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

Not in the slightest.  He'a a very capable passer, and that might be an understatement.  His court vision is probably my favorite attribute.

I think Jackson's court vision is on a different level, which may be why Tatum seems inadequate in this regard.

Considering Jackson has literally one of the worst shooting forms, I have seen in a NBA prospect ever since MKG, I can only hope and pray that his passing makes up for his awful offense.

Please, Danny, don't draft another poor shooter!
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

C.S. Lewis

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
PTI saying Jackson wants to go somewhere he can get his numbers..worried about about his stats and not winning

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13756
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
This doesn't make much sense to me. The Cs have already passed up one offensive stud who sometimes isn't totally focused on defense and lacks explosiveness in Fultz. I don't know why they would then go for the second fiddle in Tatum.

Jackson makes far and away the most sense -better fit  with Hayward, more potential, and better asset. I don't know that he will be the better player, but the Cs are in a position to take that chance.

Offline CelticsElite

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10774
  • Tommy Points: 789
Its scary but I could see Jackson becoming a less well-rounded  mkg. Would be lucky to become Tony Allen without a 3.

Offline saltlover

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12490
  • Tommy Points: 2619
Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

Not in the slightest.  He'a a very capable passer, and that might be an understatement.  His court vision is probably my favorite attribute.

I think Jackson's court vision is on a different level, which may be why Tatum seems inadequate in this regard.

Jackson absolutely has terrific court vision.  Tatum demonstrated his less because he's better at putting the ball through the basket, but what excited me when I watched Duke games were the 3-5 passes a game that were jaw-droppingly good, be it crosscourt passes off a drive, behind-the-back, no-looks to a cutter, etc.  He's a plus passer, and will fit terrifically offensively.

Offline RLewis35

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 446
  • Tommy Points: 20
  • I drink and I know things
This doesn't make much sense to me. The Cs have already passed up one offensive stud who sometimes isn't totally focused on defense and lacks explosiveness in Fultz. I don't know why they would then go for the second fiddle in Tatum.

Jackson makes far and away the most sense -better fit  with Hayward, more potential, and better asset. I don't know that he will be the better player, but the Cs are in a position to take that chance.

Agreed - its Jackson or Isaac.  I think Tatum is a smokescreen.

Offline CelticsElite

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10774
  • Tommy Points: 789
This doesn't make much sense to me. The Cs have already passed up one offensive stud who sometimes isn't totally focused on defense and lacks explosiveness in Fultz. I don't know why they would then go for the second fiddle in Tatum.

Jackson makes far and away the most sense -better fit  with Hayward, more potential, and better asset. I don't know that he will be the better player, but the Cs are in a position to take that chance.
Tatum defense isn't as bad as fultz. Also explosiveness is more important  in a guard in a league where you're facing the westbrooks and walls of the world

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

I doubt it. If anything, Tatum has always been a skilled passer offensively. Plus his length makes up for his weak altheticism.
Quote
Brad Stevens told Jayson Tatum he valued his ability to guard 1-4 while also packaging elite scoring ability.


Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

Not in the slightest.  He'a a very capable passer, and that might be an understatement.  His court vision is probably my favorite attribute.

I think Jackson's court vision is on a different level, which may be why Tatum seems inadequate in this regard.

Considering Jackson has literally one of the worst shooting forms, I have seen in a NBA prospect ever since MKG, I can only hope and pray that his passing makes up for his awful offense.

Please, Danny, don't draft another poor shooter!

Its too late for this prayer...

If you cant shoot and can defend multiple positions...he wants you

Rondo, tony allen, greene, rozier, Smart.... Its too late

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13756
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
https://mobile.twitter.com/JakeLFischer/status/877564484889477123

Brad liked Tatums ability to guard 1-4
Tatum may not be able to guard anyone very well, never mind 1's and 2's!

He has very underrated sneaky altheticism, and his wingspan helps make up in contesting shots. Then again how many SF's/PF's can you name that can guard 1's and 2's in the NBA..?
Not many, but I bet Jackson could.  I just find it strange that Stevens made that comment.

I love how Tatum apparently has an elite wingspan while Jackson has T-Rex arms - What a difference two inches makes. And I'll take ridiculous athleticism over sneaky athleticism any day.

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

I doubt it. If anything, Tatum has always been a skilled passer offensively. Plus his length makes up for his weak altheticism.
Quote
Brad Stevens told Jayson Tatum he valued his ability to guard 1-4 while also packaging elite scoring ability.


Knowing Stevens' offensive ball movement system, does anyone worry about Tatum not really fitting in with that style of play?

Not in the slightest.  He'a a very capable passer, and that might be an understatement.  His court vision is probably my favorite attribute.

I think Jackson's court vision is on a different level, which may be why Tatum seems inadequate in this regard.

Considering Jackson has literally one of the worst shooting forms, I have seen in a NBA prospect ever since MKG, I can only hope and pray that his passing makes up for his awful offense.

Please, Danny, don't draft another poor shooter!

Its too late for this prayer...

If you cant shoot and can defend multiple positions...he wants you

Rondo, tony allen, greene, rozier, Smart.... Its too late

Jaylen Brown, RJ Hunter, James Young, Kelly Olynyk, Jared Sullinger...

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
Boston needs scoring. Period. It was very clear last year that they need scoring. If this is the case take Tatum

You want a defender and an athlete playing basketball...take Jackson.

You want a guy that could be great could be a bust...take Isaac.

I prefer scoring. Tatum.