1) I think the discrepancy here can largely be attributed to the types of shots being taken. Tatum seems to have taken many more of his shots out of isolation; whereas, it seems almost all of Jackson's offense was in the fast break, penetration to the bucket, or on spot-up threes. We need Tatum's isolation/scoring abilities that we currently lack outside of IT much more than Jackson's raw athletici
But if he's shooting sub-40% in those situations, how does it help us?
What did Paul Pierce's shot chart look like after his freshman year? It seems like Tatum was statistically better than Lil' Truth in almost every way, and Pierce played a significant role on a Kansas team that had a good bit of talent so it's not a crazy comparison.
It would be crazy to predict that Tatum will be anywhere nearly as good as Pierce, but crazy predictions are all you have with players this young and undeveloped. I mean, many of the same draft reports that rave over Josh Jackson also acknowledge that his basketball skills kind of suck. This is the age of analytics but Lonzo Ball could go #2 with possibly the most broken shot of any lottery pick EVER. Philly fans are doing backflips over a player so brittle he has played less than half a season in the last three years and two "superstars" who couldn't even drag their teams to the NCAA tournament.
It's all about evaluation and development now and Ainge and Stevens have built a pretty good track record.
Mike