0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: max215 on June 17, 2017, 12:52:40 AMQuote from: Yoki_IsTheName on June 17, 2017, 12:23:01 AMQuote from: max215 on June 17, 2017, 12:21:37 AMWhy don't we pick Markelle Fultz, THEN...do nothing. Like a sane front office.Exactly, but it's looking like Danny is insane with either Josh Jackson, more assets, or both. In that case, this should be our Plan B.I'm a Danny guy. I've always respected, trusted, and defended him. If he's the one who wants to do this, fire him and replace him with Zarren. The deal that Lowe is reporting would irreparably damage this franchise.
Quote from: Yoki_IsTheName on June 17, 2017, 12:23:01 AMQuote from: max215 on June 17, 2017, 12:21:37 AMWhy don't we pick Markelle Fultz, THEN...do nothing. Like a sane front office.Exactly, but it's looking like Danny is insane with either Josh Jackson, more assets, or both. In that case, this should be our Plan B.I'm a Danny guy. I've always respected, trusted, and defended him. If he's the one who wants to do this, fire him and replace him with Zarren. The deal that Lowe is reporting would irreparably damage this franchise.
Quote from: max215 on June 17, 2017, 12:21:37 AMWhy don't we pick Markelle Fultz, THEN...do nothing. Like a sane front office.Exactly, but it's looking like Danny is insane with either Josh Jackson, more assets, or both. In that case, this should be our Plan B.
Why don't we pick Markelle Fultz, THEN...do nothing. Like a sane front office.
Quote from: Yoki_IsTheName on June 16, 2017, 11:02:12 PM...wait if Josh Jackson is available at #3 before we execute the trade? With all the rumors flying around, it seems like the target for Danny Ainge is more picks and be able to land Josh Jackson. Does Philly want Josh Jackson too, which is why they're trying to move at #1? Regardless, why can't we pick Markelle at #1, and have a deal in place with the Sixers WITH THE ASSURANCE that if Jackson is there at #3, we'll pull the trigger? Wouldn't this be a safer way to conduct business? We negotiate for what we want, and have this clause, that way if the Lakers took him, we keep the best prospect in the draft. Is this too much to ask?Might consider Tatum to be just as good and might also have a deal in place to drop down more and get the Kings picks and maybe even another future one
...wait if Josh Jackson is available at #3 before we execute the trade? With all the rumors flying around, it seems like the target for Danny Ainge is more picks and be able to land Josh Jackson. Does Philly want Josh Jackson too, which is why they're trying to move at #1? Regardless, why can't we pick Markelle at #1, and have a deal in place with the Sixers WITH THE ASSURANCE that if Jackson is there at #3, we'll pull the trigger? Wouldn't this be a safer way to conduct business? We negotiate for what we want, and have this clause, that way if the Lakers took him, we keep the best prospect in the draft. Is this too much to ask?