Let me start by saying that I am not and have not been a Paul George to the Celtics proponent. Would be be an upgrade over Crowder? Absolutely. But at the end of the day think I'd rather just roll with Jaylen and continue to develop from within.
But this Paul George stat gives me some pause. (Stolen from andy4H from Reddit)
Paul George vs. teams below .500: 19.8 ppg, 55.1% TS. Paul George vs. teams above .500: 27.4 ppg, 60.2% TS..
While it's certainly troubling that he doesn't seem to get up for inferior opponents those numbers versus the top guys are Elite. A lot of the time I watch our team slay inferior clubs like the Knicks and think that this is great but are they going to be generating the same shots against the Cavs? Well George can and if his biggest weakness as a player is that he doesn't seem to want to try against the dregs of the league, we already have plenty of guys that are more than willing to pad their stats on those games.
I've never really thought of Paul George as a true franchise altering talent on par with Lebron or Durant but if he's able to routinely throttle the league's best and has proven to be able to replicate that in the playoffs shouldn't we be looking to acquire him by any means necessary?
Is Paul George back to being a top 10 player? Should we sell the farm to trade for him? Would he resign here if we did?