See you guys call me hater, but the fact nobody is bringing up how horribly Smart has played shows how bad the bias is here. His plus/minus is -16, shooting less than 30% from the field. You tell me now why I should be harsh on him at all? Or at least criticize his performance
Smart has played well.
Those of us that watched the game and dont hate him saw that.
Hes a flawed player, and he is a terrible shooter and finisher but his compete level kept us in the game.
You are a hater. simple as that. You got called a hater because your solution was Terry fricken Rozier.
No my solution is that if a player isn't making plays and can't space the floor, which hinders the offense, you sit him. I don't really care who it's for tbh.
And you say those of us who watched the game?
I watched the game. He played hard, he hustled. Beyond that he threw up terrible shots, he was flailing all over the place, and despite his label of a stopper he was playing sub par defense.
If he played well his +/- wouldn't be in the sh1ts and he wouldn't have shot 30% from the field period.
Any other fan from any other fan base would recognize that, but the blinding Smart bias here is ridiculous