Author Topic: Lakers Failures  (Read 1216 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lakers Failures
« on: February 20, 2017, 03:12:42 PM »

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
ing-case-against-jim-buss-and-mitch-kupchak]http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2693926-magic-johnson-will-have-a-[dang]ing-case-against-jim-buss-and-mitch-kupchak

Great article about the Lakers fumbling and bumbling pretty much since the 2010 title.

Was fun to read and a good distraction from the DMC news.

Enjoy!  ;D
« Last Edit: February 20, 2017, 06:31:57 PM by Redz »
The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Re: Lakers Failure's
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2017, 03:15:42 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52860
  • Tommy Points: 2569
I cannot understand how LAL did not better than NOP trade package for Cousins.

Re: Lakers Failure's
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2017, 03:20:15 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
WHAT makes you think Vlade was going to deal with the team that shipped him off against his will.

Re: Lakers Failure's
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2017, 03:27:57 PM »

Offline GratefulCs

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3181
  • Tommy Points: 496
  • Salmon and Mashed Potatoes
I cannot understand how LAL did not better than NOP trade package for Cousins.
i would guess that they overvalue ingram, and they are not guaranteed their pick this year
I trust Danny Ainge

Re: Lakers Failure's
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2017, 03:32:36 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
Posted this in another thread, but a better fit here - just what the heck did LA offer than NO could beat?  They refused Ingram, and presumably Russell - those seem to be the two young guys they're highest on.  So like maybe Randle, or maybe Clarkson, a future 1st and salary ballast? Did they actually try to dump off Mozgov's deal? Really curious what the Kings turned down there.