I see no reason to doubt this. From Sacramento's perspective they get better on the court with both Vuc and Fournier plus probably pick up at least 1 future first.
How would that make Sacramento better?
Cousins produces almost as much on his own as Fournier and Vucevic do combined, and they'd be opening up a gaping hole in the middle defensively while also negatively affecting their spacing.
Sacramento has sucked forever WITH Cousins. Worrying about spacing in this situation is silly.
Vucevic and Fournier seem like legit NBA starters and they're locked up for two and four more years respectively. Cousins is a free agent after next season. It's swapping out a headcase superstar who is going to demand all the max money, despite never winning you a blessed thing, for two maybe-stars who will probably cost less combined and at least one first round pick.
Nothing is going to make Sacramento better this year but the trade would clearly open up more avenues for improvement than simply trusting in Cousins to stop being a knucklehead.
I can see Sacramento making the offer and I can see the Orlando GM turning it down because he's an idiot.
The best option for the Kings, of course, is too hope Boston gets the #1 and then trade Boogie for that, the Nets 2018 pick, the Memphis pick, one first rounder from us, Bradley and Zeller.
Mike
What has Orlando won with Vucevic and Fournier?
Also, one superstar > two (non-)"maybe stars".
Cousins: 27.8 points, 10.7 rebounds, 4.9 assists, 1.4 steals, 1.3 blocks, 7.7FTM, 1.7 3PM
"Maybe stars": 30.7 points, 13.3 rebounds, 6.2 assists, 2.0 steals, 1.1 blocks, 4.5FTM, 1.9 3PM
Cousins makes more threes than Fornier, and shoots a higher percentage. He's got the highest ORtg lowest DRtg, and best TS% of any of the three.
To equal or exceed the non-stars production, the Kings would needs starting SG who averages 2.9 points, 2.6 rebounds, 1.3 assists, 0.6 steals, 0.0 blocks, 0.0 FTM, and 0.2 FTM. That's roughly Demetrius Jackson production (in 4.3 minutes per game).