I've never seen a player that looks so bad when playing good.
I'm not in favor of him as a starter. And he needs another true big on the floor with him at all times. But on a more team friendly contract, I have no objections to signing him.
Wow, I see it the opposite way. Kelly's game is beautiful when he's playing well. A 7 footer who hits 3's or pump fakes and goes to the hoop to finish or pass... it's beautiful. How he slows down to let the defender go past him. Not sure how that can look bad.
I think what I mean is, he's not athletic, slow footed, he doesn't recover when out of position defensively at all, he can't leap, terribly slow getting off the floor, he up fakes too much IMO, in fear of getting his shot blocked, even at 7ft tall. He has very short arms for a player that tall.
He's lucky the C's play the style of ball they do.
Great post. You forgot to mention he steadfastly refuses to mix it up on the glass.
I really don't care if Olynyk returns. Trade him.
I'd hate to see what you think about how the rest of the team rebounds, considering that Kelly leads the team in defensive rebound % (his offensive rebound % is low, which is unsurprising given that he is kept on the perimeter most of the time on O). He also would be #2 on Toronto (a team that kills us on the glass) and just barely in 3rd behind Portis on the Bulls, who just killed us on the glass. Our team has rebounding issues, but Kelly's not the problem
And, actually, at 20.4% his defensive rebound % is better than a lot of the players people have wanted to trade for to solve the rebounding issue (i.e. Noel at 19.2%, Okafor at 15.2%, Gibson at 19.3%, Ibaka at 18.6%, Paul Millsap at 19.6%). Bogut beats him handily (with an absurd 34.3%), but obviously his durability is an issue. Kelly has his issues (ESPECIALLY consistency), but defensive rebounding is not one of them