Why would we keep him without controlling his rights? Seriously asking for people's thoughts on this. I was baffled when it happened and was concerned that he would start clicking and we then lose him - worst case idiot GM move to me - in my thinking anyway.
We obviously thought more of him than Hunter, at least in terms of value for a pre-deadline trade.
That being said, I recall either Danny or Brad talking about Young when the Young/Hunter thing was happening. The gist of what they said was that Young has been handed everything his whole life and never had to work for it, and now he does. Maybe (and I know this is weak) they thought that the only way to get more out of him was to not give him a contract for next year. If so, it seems to have worked, but as you are alluding to, where are we now?
We're in a Catch 22 with him. The most that we can give him is about $3mil next year. We want him to play well, but if he plays well (as he's starting to) someone will definitely give him more $$$. If he doesn't we won't want to keep him. Let's hope that he has upped his value a little and is used in a trade for a needed piece.
Also, a question for capologists: If the most that we can offer him is about $3mil, how many years can we offer that for? Is it just for next year?
Hey, maybe he'll give us a hometown discount!