Author Topic: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending  (Read 7243 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2017, 11:53:35 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
The cavs should trade Love or thompson
They play the same position

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2017, 12:06:45 PM »

Offline BE-Celtic

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 593
  • Tommy Points: 48
If he thinks this helps him winning another ring...

He will be remember as the guy who won, not the guy whi whined.

(Not saying I approve is attitude tho)

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2017, 12:10:15 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
If he thinks this helps him winning another ring...

He will be remember as the guy who won, not the guy whi whined.

(Not saying I approve is attitude tho)

Yup. The only thing lebaby cares about is winning a ring.

Like someone obsessed who is  money. Ugly sight

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2017, 12:14:57 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16178
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Doesn't all this stem form the comments after the Pelicans game?  I didn't say any new comments, but I could have missed them.


Also, when James was meeting with Gilbert before he came back, he was not only assured, but promised that Gilbert would spend unconditionally.  The Cavs have been sitting on an open roster spot for three weeks and they have a number of good sized trade exceptions they could use.  The Korver trade actually saved the Cavs money as well (upgrade on talent and cheaper is always a good thing).

I guess Gilbert did make new comments yesterday ""The comment about the organization being complacent I think is really misguided," Griffin said Wednesday. "Organizationally, there is absolutely no lack of clarity on what our goal set is. We are here to win championships. ... Anyone insinuating that this organization is about anything other than that would deeply upset me because ownership has invested in this at an absolutely historic level."

Gilbert also commented that the Cavs need to play better with what they have

"We believe in this team at a deep level, and we need to get better from within and play better, quite frankly," Griffin said. "We need to have a greater sense of urgency and start to develop a championship identity. I think it's clear we have not been doing that."

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2017, 02:57:02 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34625
  • Tommy Points: 1600
Doesn't all this stem form the comments after the Pelicans game?  I didn't say any new comments, but I could have missed them.


Also, when James was meeting with Gilbert before he came back, he was not only assured, but promised that Gilbert would spend unconditionally.  The Cavs have been sitting on an open roster spot for three weeks and they have a number of good sized trade exceptions they could use.  The Korver trade actually saved the Cavs money as well (upgrade on talent and cheaper is always a good thing).

I guess Gilbert did make new comments yesterday ""The comment about the organization being complacent I think is really misguided," Griffin said Wednesday. "Organizationally, there is absolutely no lack of clarity on what our goal set is. We are here to win championships. ... Anyone insinuating that this organization is about anything other than that would deeply upset me because ownership has invested in this at an absolutely historic level."

Gilbert also commented that the Cavs need to play better with what they have

"We believe in this team at a deep level, and we need to get better from within and play better, quite frankly," Griffin said. "We need to have a greater sense of urgency and start to develop a championship identity. I think it's clear we have not been doing that."
But that was just Gilbert and Griffin responding to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  That is what I was getting at.  This is another thread about the same set of comments that were discussed at length already on this board.  James didn't make new comments which would have potentially warranted a new thread (though they probably still should have been made in one of the several threads bashing James - I mean this is a Celtics blog, how many threads on James do we really need).
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation -
Deep Bench -

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #20 on: January 26, 2017, 03:26:40 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16178
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Doesn't all this stem form the comments after the Pelicans game?  I didn't say any new comments, but I could have missed them.


Also, when James was meeting with Gilbert before he came back, he was not only assured, but promised that Gilbert would spend unconditionally.  The Cavs have been sitting on an open roster spot for three weeks and they have a number of good sized trade exceptions they could use.  The Korver trade actually saved the Cavs money as well (upgrade on talent and cheaper is always a good thing).

I guess Gilbert did make new comments yesterday ""The comment about the organization being complacent I think is really misguided," Griffin said Wednesday. "Organizationally, there is absolutely no lack of clarity on what our goal set is. We are here to win championships. ... Anyone insinuating that this organization is about anything other than that would deeply upset me because ownership has invested in this at an absolutely historic level."

Gilbert also commented that the Cavs need to play better with what they have

"We believe in this team at a deep level, and we need to get better from within and play better, quite frankly," Griffin said. "We need to have a greater sense of urgency and start to develop a championship identity. I think it's clear we have not been doing that."
But that was just Gilbert and Griffin responding to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  That is what I was getting at.  This is another thread about the same set of comments that were discussed at length already on this board.  James didn't make new comments which would have potentially warranted a new thread (though they probably still should have been made in one of the several threads bashing James - I mean this is a Celtics blog, how many threads on James do we really need).

These comments were made by Griffin yesterday not after the pelicans game (note the Wednesday in the quotes). So they are new comments (unless ESPN goofed up in the writing)

Like it or not the Cavs imploding the last few weeks is one of the top stories in the NBA right now. There was a separate article posted last evening with the new quotes from Gilbert on ESPN.

This is probably reflecting those new statements. We are only 3.5 games back from them right now and would be close to tied if we had not had our own painful stretch against the blazer, knicks and wizards. I don't think calling Lebron whining or insulting names is necessary at all (and I haven't been doing that in my posts), but I can't blame anyone for sharing top page ESPN stories on here even if they lead to criticism of Lebron.

I know you are a big fan of Lebron and live in Cleveland, but trying to temper the amount of posts people make about him that are negative doesn't really seem reasonable. 

Edit new article from Dave McManin today. Think this is fair to discuss if people are interested.

http://www.espn.com/blog/cleveland-cavaliers/post/_/id/3553/fantasy-no-more-lebron-james-gives-cavs-season-a-wake-up-call

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2017, 03:37:12 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34625
  • Tommy Points: 1600
Doesn't all this stem form the comments after the Pelicans game?  I didn't say any new comments, but I could have missed them.


Also, when James was meeting with Gilbert before he came back, he was not only assured, but promised that Gilbert would spend unconditionally.  The Cavs have been sitting on an open roster spot for three weeks and they have a number of good sized trade exceptions they could use.  The Korver trade actually saved the Cavs money as well (upgrade on talent and cheaper is always a good thing).

I guess Gilbert did make new comments yesterday ""The comment about the organization being complacent I think is really misguided," Griffin said Wednesday. "Organizationally, there is absolutely no lack of clarity on what our goal set is. We are here to win championships. ... Anyone insinuating that this organization is about anything other than that would deeply upset me because ownership has invested in this at an absolutely historic level."

Gilbert also commented that the Cavs need to play better with what they have

"We believe in this team at a deep level, and we need to get better from within and play better, quite frankly," Griffin said. "We need to have a greater sense of urgency and start to develop a championship identity. I think it's clear we have not been doing that."
But that was just Gilbert and Griffin responding to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  That is what I was getting at.  This is another thread about the same set of comments that were discussed at length already on this board.  James didn't make new comments which would have potentially warranted a new thread (though they probably still should have been made in one of the several threads bashing James - I mean this is a Celtics blog, how many threads on James do we really need).

These comments were made by Griffin yesterday not after the pelicans game (note the Wednesday in the quotes). So they are new comments (unless ESPN goofed up in the writing)

Like it or not the Cavs imploding the last few weeks is one of the top stories in the NBA right now. There was a separate article posted last evening with the new quotes from Gilbert on ESPN.

This is probably reflecting those new statements. We are only 3.5 games back from them right now and would be close to tied if we had not had our own painful stretch against the blazer, knicks and wizards. I don't think calling Lebron whining or insulting names is necessary at all (and I haven't been doing that in my posts), but I can't blame anyone for sharing top page ESPN stories on here even if they lead to criticism of Lebron.

I know you are a big fan of Lebron and live in Cleveland, but trying to temper the amount of posts people make about him that are negative doesn't really seem reasonable. 

Edit new article from Dave McManin today. Think this is fair to discuss if people are interested.

http://www.espn.com/blog/cleveland-cavaliers/post/_/id/3553/fantasy-no-more-lebron-james-gives-cavs-season-a-wake-up-call
You totally aren't understanding my point.  The thread is talking about James whining, but James didn't do any new whining.  It was the same whining that was already discussed in the playmaker thread.  Sure the Owner and GM responded to James' comments yesterday, but James himself didn't make any new comments so there wasn't any new whining from which this thread was created. 

Your quoted article proves exactly what I am saying as it refers to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  All of these new articles and ESPN posts, stem directly from those comments, for which we already have a thread. 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation -
Deep Bench -

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #22 on: January 26, 2017, 03:40:41 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
It'd be great if the Cavs traded Lebron. Shipped him out to Utah or Denver or the smallest market they could find.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #23 on: January 26, 2017, 03:44:12 PM »

Offline hodgy03038

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3820
  • Tommy Points: 461
I think they should comply with his wishes under the caveat the HE pays the additional luxury tax.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #24 on: January 26, 2017, 03:49:45 PM »

Offline celticsclay

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16178
  • Tommy Points: 1407
Doesn't all this stem form the comments after the Pelicans game?  I didn't say any new comments, but I could have missed them.


Also, when James was meeting with Gilbert before he came back, he was not only assured, but promised that Gilbert would spend unconditionally.  The Cavs have been sitting on an open roster spot for three weeks and they have a number of good sized trade exceptions they could use.  The Korver trade actually saved the Cavs money as well (upgrade on talent and cheaper is always a good thing).

I guess Gilbert did make new comments yesterday ""The comment about the organization being complacent I think is really misguided," Griffin said Wednesday. "Organizationally, there is absolutely no lack of clarity on what our goal set is. We are here to win championships. ... Anyone insinuating that this organization is about anything other than that would deeply upset me because ownership has invested in this at an absolutely historic level."

Gilbert also commented that the Cavs need to play better with what they have

"We believe in this team at a deep level, and we need to get better from within and play better, quite frankly," Griffin said. "We need to have a greater sense of urgency and start to develop a championship identity. I think it's clear we have not been doing that."
But that was just Gilbert and Griffin responding to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  That is what I was getting at.  This is another thread about the same set of comments that were discussed at length already on this board.  James didn't make new comments which would have potentially warranted a new thread (though they probably still should have been made in one of the several threads bashing James - I mean this is a Celtics blog, how many threads on James do we really need).

These comments were made by Griffin yesterday not after the pelicans game (note the Wednesday in the quotes). So they are new comments (unless ESPN goofed up in the writing)

Like it or not the Cavs imploding the last few weeks is one of the top stories in the NBA right now. There was a separate article posted last evening with the new quotes from Gilbert on ESPN.

This is probably reflecting those new statements. We are only 3.5 games back from them right now and would be close to tied if we had not had our own painful stretch against the blazer, knicks and wizards. I don't think calling Lebron whining or insulting names is necessary at all (and I haven't been doing that in my posts), but I can't blame anyone for sharing top page ESPN stories on here even if they lead to criticism of Lebron.

I know you are a big fan of Lebron and live in Cleveland, but trying to temper the amount of posts people make about him that are negative doesn't really seem reasonable. 

Edit new article from Dave McManin today. Think this is fair to discuss if people are interested.

http://www.espn.com/blog/cleveland-cavaliers/post/_/id/3553/fantasy-no-more-lebron-james-gives-cavs-season-a-wake-up-call
You totally aren't understanding my point.  The thread is talking about James whining, but James didn't do any new whining.  It was the same whining that was already discussed in the playmaker thread.  Sure the Owner and GM responded to James' comments yesterday, but James himself didn't make any new comments so there wasn't any new whining from which this thread was created. 

Your quoted article proves exactly what I am saying as it refers to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  All of these new articles and ESPN posts, stem directly from those comments, for which we already have a thread.

So the grievance is that there are multiple threads instead of all in one thread? Ideally they would go in one, unfortunately certain topics get buried and people see a front page ESPN story and if they don't see anything recent on latest forum topics they just make a new thread. ESPN could also probably put this all in one article they continually update, but they don't do that either.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #25 on: January 26, 2017, 04:44:18 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34625
  • Tommy Points: 1600
Doesn't all this stem form the comments after the Pelicans game?  I didn't say any new comments, but I could have missed them.


Also, when James was meeting with Gilbert before he came back, he was not only assured, but promised that Gilbert would spend unconditionally.  The Cavs have been sitting on an open roster spot for three weeks and they have a number of good sized trade exceptions they could use.  The Korver trade actually saved the Cavs money as well (upgrade on talent and cheaper is always a good thing).

I guess Gilbert did make new comments yesterday ""The comment about the organization being complacent I think is really misguided," Griffin said Wednesday. "Organizationally, there is absolutely no lack of clarity on what our goal set is. We are here to win championships. ... Anyone insinuating that this organization is about anything other than that would deeply upset me because ownership has invested in this at an absolutely historic level."

Gilbert also commented that the Cavs need to play better with what they have

"We believe in this team at a deep level, and we need to get better from within and play better, quite frankly," Griffin said. "We need to have a greater sense of urgency and start to develop a championship identity. I think it's clear we have not been doing that."
But that was just Gilbert and Griffin responding to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  That is what I was getting at.  This is another thread about the same set of comments that were discussed at length already on this board.  James didn't make new comments which would have potentially warranted a new thread (though they probably still should have been made in one of the several threads bashing James - I mean this is a Celtics blog, how many threads on James do we really need).

These comments were made by Griffin yesterday not after the pelicans game (note the Wednesday in the quotes). So they are new comments (unless ESPN goofed up in the writing)

Like it or not the Cavs imploding the last few weeks is one of the top stories in the NBA right now. There was a separate article posted last evening with the new quotes from Gilbert on ESPN.

This is probably reflecting those new statements. We are only 3.5 games back from them right now and would be close to tied if we had not had our own painful stretch against the blazer, knicks and wizards. I don't think calling Lebron whining or insulting names is necessary at all (and I haven't been doing that in my posts), but I can't blame anyone for sharing top page ESPN stories on here even if they lead to criticism of Lebron.

I know you are a big fan of Lebron and live in Cleveland, but trying to temper the amount of posts people make about him that are negative doesn't really seem reasonable. 

Edit new article from Dave McManin today. Think this is fair to discuss if people are interested.

http://www.espn.com/blog/cleveland-cavaliers/post/_/id/3553/fantasy-no-more-lebron-james-gives-cavs-season-a-wake-up-call
You totally aren't understanding my point.  The thread is talking about James whining, but James didn't do any new whining.  It was the same whining that was already discussed in the playmaker thread.  Sure the Owner and GM responded to James' comments yesterday, but James himself didn't make any new comments so there wasn't any new whining from which this thread was created. 

Your quoted article proves exactly what I am saying as it refers to James' comments after the Pelicans game.  All of these new articles and ESPN posts, stem directly from those comments, for which we already have a thread.

So the grievance is that there are multiple threads instead of all in one thread? Ideally they would go in one, unfortunately certain topics get buried and people see a front page ESPN story and if they don't see anything recent on latest forum topics they just make a new thread. ESPN could also probably put this all in one article they continually update, but they don't do that either.
I merely asked a question, i.e. doesn't this stem from James' comments after the Pelicans game?  Because I didn't recall seeing any new comments from James.  I was honestly asking because I wasn't sure if I missed some new comments.  It is now clear I did not and this thread was created to complain about the same comments that James made after the Pelicans game.  That is all I wanted to know.  Had you simply said yes, my question would have been answered, but for some reason you felt the need to go into a long winded response that didn't actually respond to my question and thus we went back and forth a few times.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation -
Deep Bench -

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #26 on: January 26, 2017, 05:05:50 PM »

Offline Fan from VT

  • NCE
  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4205
  • Tommy Points: 777
Lebron has also had more influence on that roster and the moves they have made than any player in the NBA. You can't shop for the groceries and complain how they taste. Thompson is really overpaid and Lebron had a hand in that.

Yeah, it's like there's supposed to be $100 for groceries, you spend $127, and with that $127 you are getting a filet mignon (Lebron), Lobster (Kyrie), and maybe some quality Sirloin (Love), then being upset you have to eat soup and salad a few days of the week.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #27 on: January 26, 2017, 05:24:46 PM »

Online sahara

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 860
  • Tommy Points: 84
It'd be great if the Cavs traded Lebron. Shipped him out to Utah or Denver or the smallest market they could find.

This is the way I want this jerk to end his career.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #28 on: January 26, 2017, 05:44:47 PM »

Offline steve

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1106
  • Tommy Points: 79
It'd be great if the Cavs traded Lebron. Shipped him out to Utah or Denver or the smallest market they could find.

This is the way I want this jerk to end his career.

Lebron has a no trade clause. So it would have to be mutual.

I think he's smart enough to know that CLE won't win a championship with this roster. I think CLE knows this too.

BKN picks, Jaylen, Smart for Lebron.

We have the perfect team for Lebron to win a championship, IT is clutch in the 4th similar to Kyrie, Horford is better than Love. Crowder and Avery are upgrades as well. Brad Stevens is a better coach.

This is all contingent on Lebron forcing his way out, obviously.

Re: LeBron/Cavs clash on payroll spending
« Reply #29 on: January 28, 2017, 04:39:51 AM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
I don't normally watch TNT, but this one is actually interesting.

I agree with  O'Neal >we all want the best player>

When you play pickup with friends do you want the best player or not? Why should it be any different when the stakes are way much higher?