I've heard this draft called exceptional and potentially historically good, but this is the first guy I've seen who has suggested the top two (Ball and Fultz) are a step above everyone else and might be transcendent talents: https://deanondraft.com/2017/01/23/how-good-is-this-years-draft/
Also, I've now read multiple draft experts who have said Jaylen Brown would go outside the top 10 if he were in this draft. Kevin O'Conner thinks he'd go 7-10. So safe to say even if we miss out on fultz and Ball we will be adding this franchise's best hope of a future Allstar. Unless Brooklyn digs themselves out of the bottom 10 somehow, I guess.
I agree about where Brown would go, but people have to stop using this article lol. The guys evaluation of talent is so out of whack. Look at his prospect rankings for the last few drafts.
According to the authors prospect rankings, he has Wiggins below the following players: Okafor, Gordon, Exum, Ingram, and Deangello Russell. Now granted he has an argument that the rest of the players on the list are better so far than wiggins, but those 4 are unexcuseable. DAR has regressed as the season has gone on, Exum isn't even better than Smart at this junction, Gordon is all potential and no substance, and Okafor is racking up DNP-CDs (or he was)...... I want to listen to the guy, but this is just absurd.
In a comment at the bottom, the author actually refers to Wiggins as a bust. I don't know about most here, but a 3rd year player averaging 21, 4 and 2.5 on 45/34/73 isn't a bust. Is he an amazing superstar world beater as some hyped him to be? Of course not. But we can't just throw around the B word because players haven't lived up to the hype.