0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: alewilliam789 on December 20, 2016, 10:17:47 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on December 20, 2016, 10:16:16 PMAnyone else notice that Bradley's D picks up dramatically at the end of the game? I think he's lost some of his defensive step due to his concerted effort to rebound and score more.Definitely see that.My issue is why aren't we playing Bradley on more PGs?? He's an on ball defender for PGs, but is often outmatched on physical/bigger 2 guards.Who will IT defend?
Quote from: jpotter33 on December 20, 2016, 10:16:16 PMAnyone else notice that Bradley's D picks up dramatically at the end of the game? I think he's lost some of his defensive step due to his concerted effort to rebound and score more.Definitely see that.My issue is why aren't we playing Bradley on more PGs?? He's an on ball defender for PGs, but is often outmatched on physical/bigger 2 guards.
Anyone else notice that Bradley's D picks up dramatically at the end of the game? I think he's lost some of his defensive step due to his concerted effort to rebound and score more.
Kelly haters should give a little love. KO with some fight and some impact.
Terrible call. I'm surprised KO is still out there. But that was a travel by Martin and definitely not a foul on Kelly.
Quote from: liam on December 20, 2016, 10:18:20 PMQuote from: alewilliam789 on December 20, 2016, 10:17:47 PMQuote from: jpotter33 on December 20, 2016, 10:16:16 PMAnyone else notice that Bradley's D picks up dramatically at the end of the game? I think he's lost some of his defensive step due to his concerted effort to rebound and score more.Definitely see that.My issue is why aren't we playing Bradley on more PGs?? He's an on ball defender for PGs, but is often outmatched on physical/bigger 2 guards.Who will IT defend?In this case Troy Daniels because he isn't a threat as long as you chase him off the 3 point line