0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: alldaboston on November 19, 2016, 04:21:46 PMQuote from: Kuberski33 on November 19, 2016, 04:09:56 PMTalent wins in basketball. This team down 2 starters loses to this GS team probably 19 out of 20 times.hell, this team even with 2 starters back will lose to that GS team at least 15 out of 20 times. really, the overreactions to this game are hilarious. did anyone seriously expect us to do well? i think a lot of people just have very high expectations since we've played them so well over the past 2 years. that being said, the team does have an effort problem right now. gotta be better.You really think this is an overreaction thread, when it only poses questions? The question is whether or not the honeymoon is over for the coach. It goes much further than one game.
Quote from: Kuberski33 on November 19, 2016, 04:09:56 PMTalent wins in basketball. This team down 2 starters loses to this GS team probably 19 out of 20 times.hell, this team even with 2 starters back will lose to that GS team at least 15 out of 20 times. really, the overreactions to this game are hilarious. did anyone seriously expect us to do well? i think a lot of people just have very high expectations since we've played them so well over the past 2 years. that being said, the team does have an effort problem right now. gotta be better.
Talent wins in basketball. This team down 2 starters loses to this GS team probably 19 out of 20 times.
Does he bail for college if the heat turns up.
How should Celtics management handle this.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.
Quote from: Londongreen on November 19, 2016, 03:39:04 PMCoach is fine, we are over achievers and now playing like we are a contender and can play lazy. We are the shortest team in the League and we have a rebounding issue and soft bigs and got Al who is not a rebounder waiting. Hate to miss old players but Sully and turner were something. Any medicore rebounding big would do, the d league is full of them.It is the coach's job to manage expectations and make sure the players are focused based on their abilities, not the hype.As to the Turner factor, I told all that would listen last season that Turner was an 'invaluable' asset because he was perhaps the only player on the team that could get his shot and get to any spot he wanted on the court. We should have kept him.
Coach is fine, we are over achievers and now playing like we are a contender and can play lazy. We are the shortest team in the League and we have a rebounding issue and soft bigs and got Al who is not a rebounder waiting. Hate to miss old players but Sully and turner were something. Any medicore rebounding big would do, the d league is full of them.
Brad's fine. Team is still overachieving.
IMO Brad is fine, he coaches the team he has in front of him. He lost 2 starters off his shallow front line.I'm a bit disappointed in Danny, going SO small, and having too many finesse only players on the roster.