For whatever reason it does seem like Ainge has a strong preference for undersized, underathletic, skilled big men. He has very rarely drafted any of these pogo stick, roll-down-the-lane-and-dunk type guys.
His draft record selecting bigs who are underappreciated due to a lack of physical tools is pretty good though.
The reason is simple. Danny's philosophy seems to be to draft good basketball players rather than reaching for certain positions. Clearly he doesn't always hit but seems like a solid strategy. Never mind that good bigs are more rare than good smells.
Yeah, I understand the strategy.
I think it limits the upside of his picks, especially at the big positions, though.
The Celtics could really use a big man with an intense physical dimension to his game. They've needed that for a while now, actually.
You can't build a team entirely out of physical freaks, but you're at a disadvantage if your whole team is premised on taking advantage of a market inefficiency re: skilled guys with below average measurements.
Good points Pho.
He even did the same thing again with Yabu. Nice physical gifts and actually he has some athleticism for a change.
But he's undersized! Again! Just like Mickey, Bass, Baby Davis, Leon Powe, Ryan Gomes. And now Yabu. He just Loves 6'7" Power forwards because that's six of them right there.
That's why Zizic is a revelation almost 7 feet with a 9'3" standing reach. And he plays like a real big. With plus athleticism.
If those guys were 7' tall, they would have been gone a lot earlier. When you have the picks that Danny's had, you get flawed prospects
You're not gonna find a smart, inside player, with prototypical size, great defense and rebounding plus the ability to pass and score from outside late in the draft because those players rarely exist in general, and when they do they go early. Instead you have guys who might be a few of those things, but have major flaws. Some are dumb as bricks, some are soft, some have awful hands, some are short. Of those types that are available, Danny tends to go for the shorter players with more complete games (and given his relative success taking these guys, it makes sense).
Saying "Danny likes short bigs" is disingenuous. He would take a big with the same talent but better size any day of the week, but it's a false dilemma. The choice isn't "6'10 guy or 6'7 guy", it's "6'10 guy with huge holes in his game or 6'7 guy with way fewer holes". Yes, those guys with huge holes in their games but good size sometimes turn into good or great players, but the vast majority turn out to be busts. Of all the holes late-draft big man prospects have, height is just the one Danny worries least about